• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Radu Drăgușin

Thought he did really well today.
Did really well defensively. Some excellent involvements.

Lack of ball playing quality really showed though and that hurt us.
Madness dropping him for someone proven not good enough.
Says a lot about how differently Ange rates Romero and Dragusin to put Romero back in even with VdV back.

On this I agree with what I at least perceive Ange's opinion to be.
 
He is begining to look a good buy, only 22 so lets hope he pushes on.

Good solid RCB but could do with a ball playing LCB to partner him with, hopefully Davies can fulfil that role until next summer then we sign the next Vertonghen who will keep van de Ven and Udogie on their toes.
 
Good solid RCB but could do with a ball playing LCB to partner him with, hopefully Davies can fulfil that role until next summer then we sign the next Vertonghen who will keep van de Ven and Udogie on their toes.
Do not disagree at all, sadly there are not many as good as Vertonghen about sadly.
 
Excellent tonight.
Excellent defensively.

Far from it on the ball. I get that Gray is a wonderful talent, and that Dragusin himself is a young player. But having an 18 year old playing out of position taking way more responsibility on the ball than you is not a good look.
 
Sadly Romero will start again as soon as he's able to move around without using crutches.
It's almost like Ange really rates ball playing ability in his centre backs really highly. That's not strange given that we play a really ambitious style of football and have no deep play makers in midfield.
 
Excellent defensively.

Far from it on the ball. I get that Gray is a wonderful talent, and that Dragusin himself is a young player. But having an 18 year old playing out of position taking way more responsibility on the ball than you is not a good look.

Thought he was decent on the ball, with their pressing and an out position 18 year cm beside you as your CB partner I'm not sure I want him being clever with his passing tbh.
 
It's almost like Ange really rates ball playing ability in his centre backs really highly. That's not strange given that we play a really ambitious style of football and have no deep play makers in midfield.

More like he really overrates Romero's ball playing ability. I thought we were good at playing out in the early parts of the game yesterday when were moving it quickly. Then things fell apart once we got into the opposition half, but that's another story.
 
Thought he was decent on the ball, with their pressing and an out position 18 year cm beside you as your CB partner I'm not sure I want him being clever with his passing tbh.
His passing is fine as long as he's not under real pressure. The odd misplaced pass, but he's fine.

But he struggles when he's under real pressure. Doesn't want the ball in those situations, meaning we often lack an option. Ends up just clearing it under pressure quite a bit. Makes us a lot easier to press successfully.

I agree that he shouldn't be too ambitious. The potential for errors is definitely higher then.
More like he really overrates Romero's ball playing ability. I thought we were good at playing out in the early parts of the game yesterday when were moving it quickly. Then things fell apart once we got into the opposition half, but that's another story.
Agreed we were quite alright playing out for periods at least.

There's a negative synergy between lacking ball playing quality deep and having forwards that need specific service to thrive.

When we lack creativity and hold up play in the front line what we do with the ball deep becomes more important.

Romero is our best ball playing CB. Dragusin probably is our worst. Do you disagree?

I don't want to be harsh on him. That's the player he is and he should play to his abilities and not try to be something he's not. But it's a real issue right now with our injuries.
 
His passing/travelling is never as assured when playing LCB. I understand why Ange went that way last night but would good to have Dragu get 10 games in his preferred position of RCB.
 
His passing is fine as long as he's not under real pressure. The odd misplaced pass, but he's fine.

But he struggles when he's under real pressure. Doesn't want the ball in those situations, meaning we often lack an option. Ends up just clearing it under pressure quite a bit. Makes us a lot easier to press successfully.

I agree that he shouldn't be too ambitious. The potential for errors is definitely higher then.

Agreed we were quite alright playing out for periods at least.

There's a negative synergy between lacking ball playing quality deep and having forwards that need specific service to thrive.

When we lack creativity and hold up play in the front line what we do with the ball deep becomes more important.

Romero is our best ball playing CB. Dragusin probably is our worst. Do you disagree?

I don't want to be harsh on him. That's the player he is and he should play to his abilities and not try to be something he's not. But it's a real issue right now with our injuries.

Don't think Dragusin is that bad, but for me it's more about the players providing options for each rather than anyone's passing ability. The other weaknesses in Romero's game is a bigger issue the way we're conceding chances. If we're not going to set up to defend better we'll need some incredible individual performers back there.
 
Don't think Dragusin is that bad, but for me it's more about the players providing options for each rather than anyone's passing ability. The other weaknesses in Romero's game is a bigger issue the way we're conceding chances. If we're not going to set up to defend better we'll need some incredible individual performers back there.
Romero gets criticism for slowing us down on the ball. To me he provides exactly what we need (related to what you say), for a player to be comfortable enough on the ball to wait for that movement to happen and find a good option to pass to. Options are harder to find when the initial passing lacks purpose.

A lot of times we've seen him do just that. Keep the ball, be composed, then find a good pass through the lines when the movement and space is there.

It was less of an issue against Rangers, or an issue less of the time, but a lot of our defensive issues this season have stemmed from us failing to deal well with a high press. Failing to get out. Getting counter attacks against us and coming under sustained pressure.

I know Romero was at fault for some goals earlier in the season. But we had one of the better defensive records in the league with him playing. Something was working rather well. Our current problems aren't just that Romero is missing by any stretch. But his ball playing makes us better defensively because we keep possession better and offer more of an attacking threat for opponents with him.

This kind of system needs at least one quality ball playing CB to work well. Or at the very least it needs it when we don't have a deep playmaker type in midfield.
 
Romero gets criticism for slowing us down on the ball. To me he provides exactly what we need (related to what you say), for a player to be comfortable enough on the ball to wait for that movement to happen and find a good option to pass to. Options are harder to find when the initial passing lacks purpose.

A lot of times we've seen him do just that. Keep the ball, be composed, then find a good pass through the lines when the movement and space is there.

It was less of an issue against Rangers, or an issue less of the time, but a lot of our defensive issues this season have stemmed from us failing to deal well with a high press. Failing to get out. Getting counter attacks against us and coming under sustained pressure.

I know Romero was at fault for some goals earlier in the season. But we had one of the better defensive records in the league with him playing. Something was working rather well. Our current problems aren't just that Romero is missing by any stretch. But his ball playing makes us better defensively because we keep possession better and offer more of an attacking threat for opponents with him.

This kind of system needs at least one quality ball playing CB to work well. Or at the very least it needs it when we don't have a deep playmaker type in midfield.
It's the comparing X player to some mythical perfect player that gets me.

For me, it's about having a player who's consistent - you know what to expect - not how perfect they are.

To my mind, our 'know what to expect' players are (putting aside injury issues for a minute):
Vicario, Forster, Dragusin, Udogie, Romero, Porro, Spence. Davies, van de Ven, Gray, Bergvall, Sarr, Bentancur, Richarlison, Werner, Solanke, Kulusevski, Odobert.

The 'will they turn up today' players are:
Bissouma, Maddison, Son, Johnson.
 
His passing is fine as long as he's not under real pressure. The odd misplaced pass, but he's fine.

But he struggles when he's under real pressure. Doesn't want the ball in those situations, meaning we often lack an option. Ends up just clearing it under pressure quite a bit. Makes us a lot easier to press successfully.

I agree that he shouldn't be too ambitious. The potential for errors is definitely higher then.

Agreed we were quite alright playing out for periods at least.

There's a negative synergy between lacking ball playing quality deep and having forwards that need specific service to thrive.

When we lack creativity and hold up play in the front line what we do with the ball deep becomes more important.

Romero is our best ball playing CB. Dragusin probably is our worst. Do you disagree?

I don't want to be harsh on him. That's the player he is and he should play to his abilities and not try to be something he's not. But it's a real issue right now with our injuries.

His passing is one of his biggest weaknesses IMO. He’s not good enough to start long term, could have a worse back up I guess.
 
He’s 22 and played 8 games in the league. He’s already shown what he’s capable of in more familiar surroundings at the Euros.

Good height and good mix of athleticism and physicality.

Worth sticking with imo.

I was talking specifically about his passing which I maintain is one of his major weaknesses.
 
Back