Ok discount that and look at Afghanistan and Pakistan.I'm not defending the actions of Saudi Arabia, but suggesting that they were in some way behind 9/11 is getting a little too "Jet fuel doesn't melt steel" for me.
Incidentally, am I the only one who thinks its utterly fudging embarrassing that so many high profile "leaders" (and such) are conducting this all on Twitter?!
I don't think they conduct these things on Twitter (well, maybe Trump) but Twitter is the world where all the journos and pundits live. A quick tweet and it's everywhere else instantly.
I don't think they conduct these things on Twitter (well, maybe Trump) but Twitter is the world where all the journos and pundits live. A quick tweet and it's everywhere else instantly.
Maybe not leaders but the top line lot her love it, they are all on there churning their crap
Yes - a lot of people argue its good as it allows direct contact but I think its embarrassing. It is the Trump affect.The leader of the Scottish government is on twitter taking jabs at the Prime Minister, making statements about what has been said, and what she is/isnt prepared for, and making demands.
Id say she is conducting plenty. And it is utterly classless. And it is of course far from just her.
Is this really what politics in this country has become? Its shameful and embarrassing, no wonder they cant organise a tinkle up in a brewery.
Yes - a lot of people argue its good as it allows direct contact but I think its embarrassing. It is the Trump affect.
It would allow them to join EFTA but not necessarily the EEA.
http://www.efta.int/About-EFTA/Frequently-asked-questions-EFTA-EEA-EFTA-membership-and-Brexit-328676
If the UK would re-join EFTA, would it automatically become party to the EEA Agreement?
Not automatically, as each EFTA state decides on its own whether it applies to be party to the EEA Agreement or not. According to Article 128 of the EEA Agreement, “any European State becoming a member of the Community shall, and the Swiss Confederation or any European State becoming a member of EFTA may, apply to become a party to this Agreement. It shall address its application to the EEA Council.” The EEA Council takes political decisions leading to the amendment of the EEA Agreement, including the possible enlargement of the EEA. Decisions by the EEA Council are taken by consensus between all EU Member States on the one hand and the three EEA EFTA States - Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway - on the other.
I end up looking at quite a lot of tweets these days, even though I don't actually have Twitter...
Swiss is still a rule taker, still free movement and ECJ are still final and binding arbiter.Yes - sorry. I did know the difference between EFTA and EEA and think what I wrote is correct.
The better situation is EFTA without EEA (i.e. Switzerland rather than Norway), although neither are great; other than they are much easier to leave than the withdrawal agreement
at work the Trump thread is pretty much blank for me as it bans twitter.I end up looking at quite a lot of tweets these days, even though I don't actually have Twitter...
at work the Trump thread is pretty much blank for me as it bans twitter.
at work the Trump thread is pretty much blank for me as it bans twitter.
Unfortunately hanging every member of the SNP upside down in the Thames for 10 minutes is also off the table.
I don't believe that describing EFTA and EEA members as rule takers is particularly accurate.Swiss is still a rule taker, still free movement and ECJ are still final and binding arbiter.
(*they are part of EEA in all but a few small things)