And as I alluded to, I think it's artificial / overly-simplistic to treat a new generation as 'not religious yet', when so many of them are born into the Muslim faith and culture.
In any case, I would have thought that a background noise of mature rational and critical thinking would be more effective than ridicule - which I take to mean your playground-like taunts of 'imaginary friends in the sky' and the like.
Agreed on Christianity, but that happened in a very different context - change happened from within, not because of the ridicule from a completely separate culture with whom it was partially at war with.
And actually I interpret Scara's posts as mass, purposeful ridicule - perhaps because of the way that he talks on this forum.
The trouble with forums is that people say things in response to a particular poster, which other people take as a comment on their own views or interpretations of what is being discussed.
I think you need a bit of both. Mature rational critical thinking, but also more emotional and humorous criticism. The problem is that for many religion is the one topic where this is seen as blasphemy and somehow subhuman.
What would we think if people said not to insult/ridicule communists because the extremists might use that in their recruitment? What would people think if someone said not to make fun of neo-nazis because their violent groups could use that in their recruitment? I think they would be laughed out of any serious conversation, of course we're not going to bend to that kind of pressure. But with religion the perceived offense of "blasphemy" from the non-religious or people of other faiths is somehow still seen as a reason not to criticise by way to many.
There are voices "within Islam" willing to criticise and willing to suffer death threats as a consequence. Are we on the outside not going to mirror their voices? Of course when these voices within Islam make a move all the way into atheism they're no longer "inside voices" for the religion, but culturally I think they still are voices from within at least part of a group. Are we on the outside not going to support them? Can we support them without being insulting? In Norway Rushdie's publisher supported Rushdie at least to some extent - by publishing his book. This was seen as insulting enough that he got shot (and luckily survived).
If anything I think outside voices are needed because insults are actually jugded much harsher when from someone in your in-group. Why Rushdie got death threaths where perhaps a non-Muslim would have "gotten away with it". Many of those voices are scared though. There's still a fear of being labeled an apostate, a very legitimate fear by the way. I think these people need our support.
In an ideal world everyone would just get on with it but sadly that's never gonna happen.
If people want to believe in religion that's their choice.
Of course. And you don't see me stopping people on the street asking if they're made the journey to atheism yet. Or knocking on their doors sticking flyers about Sam Harris books on their doors if they don't answer. You don't hear atheists telling dying people that they can convert now at the end and at least die without these misconceptions. We very much leave that kind of behaviour to the religious.
But if someone makes claims about religions in public. Or try to convince others to join their religion. Or if someone seeks out a discussion on religion with atheism as part of the topic... Then there will usually be atheists there more than willing to take up the debate.
I usually turn off my tv if religious programming comes on. I assume it's not for me. I don't think you get many atheists writing tv-stations about the perceived insult to our lack of faith. I think we should be able to expect the same level of respect from the religious when our opinions are voiced in appropriate ways.
Well it's certainly phasing out as we evolve yes but you've only got ta look to the schools there. Religion isn't being taught like it was for fear of offending people. Total bollox. If you go to a CofE school, whether you want to or not, you're taught about the bible to hell with who it offends.
Religion will always be there though whether we accept it or not.
I agree that religion will probably always be there. But it's influence can be minimized.
We know that how we think influences how we act. It's naive to think that a system of thought as complex, persuasive and dominating as religion doesn't influence how people act towards others. Take the more recent gay right movements. Their opposition has been to a great extent religious. And if you definite "moderate" as the large group in the middle with "average" opinions there have been a lot of moderate resistance to this (imo) very clearly good social movement towards progress. This religious opposition to social progress has been present at every stage of social progress in the last centuries from what I know. Even though most religious people are good, kind people. It's one of the powers of religion and group thinking. And part of why I think religion should be actively opposed. Religion makes good people do horrible things.
nobody ever has taken to religion through personal choice, until you become an attempted target of indoctrination you won't have heard of it
schools should have a religious ed track, like sex ed, this is what can happen if you don't use a condom, this is what can happen if you don't insist on scientific evidence of magical occurrences and logic based reasoning
Well. Religions have spawned in just about every culture we know of throughout history. We know that we're dying and we're afraid of it. We've understood very little about how the world around us works in the past and we've looked for explanations. Place a group of children on an isolated island and in addition to being rightly tried for child abuse I think you'll probably see a religion created sooner or later even without any outside influence.
You're right of course that the indoctrination of children plays a huge part in the continued success of religious ideas. And you're very much right about the lack of critical thinking in schools.