glorygloryeze
Tom Huddlestone
As I've said all along, less about terrorism, more about what happens to Muslims in the name of Islam. What are the Christian equivalents to the honour killings? To acid being thrown in the faces of young girls for wishing to go to school? To female genital mutilation? To punishment rapes? To institutionalized discrimination through sharia? There are barbaric practices and I don't see them in any real frequencies from Christians.
'Tar and feather' acts in Northern Ireland when you just associate 'too closely' with those on the 'other side'. Not to mention kneecapping. Have you seen the furore about women priests? Have you seen the anti-abortion militancy and the bias against women that can entail? Do you think sexism is quite common in many parts of Christianity, Mormonism for example? We could go on; many would claim these to be barbaric too; but arguments about who is 'more barbaric' are pointless imo as they feed the crusade beast.
You said I wasn't a good source, you said that BBC, CNN and Fox were not good sources and accused me of only using them. I pointed you towards a source that I think is about as impeccable as a source can get on this issue. And your answer is "I don't know who this person is or care" before going down the same path you were already on. But I'm biased. I'm only looking at mainFirewood-gatherer western sources? I'm feeding into the intended mindstate? You won't even take the time to quickly examine the views of a named source for an opinion contrary to yours. Because you don't ****ing care! But I'm the one only exposing myself to biased sources?
Now that, my friend, is harsh. For someone who accuses to vehemently about sources and biases... That's real weak.
I said BBC et al were often biased sources who have grown out of the Christian monolithic mindset and often feed the crusade beast from a Christian biased perspective imo. For example, would they highlight 'Christian atrocities' that may occur and highlight them as such using those words (in the same way the term 'Islamic atrocities' would be used).
So you chose another source, one woman who you believe is 'impeccable' because she is an individual who has criticized Islam based on her individual experiences. Ok fine.
But shall I choose another person with an opposite mindstate - perhaps a person who is say British and who has converted to Islam and says Christianity is 'barbaric' - and 'trade blows'? If I can find that single person would that make it valid for somebody to say 'Christianity is a more barbaric religion'?
In fact if I select some people who say how fulfilling and happy they are with their Islamic faith would that help as well?
Last edited: