Has Dragusin ever played as an RB before? Let alone one who is expected to play as a pseudo playmaker?
Or is your thinking 'anyone is better than Royal'?
Played there twice as far as i can see (whoscored)
Has Dragusin ever played as an RB before? Let alone one who is expected to play as a pseudo playmaker?
Or is your thinking 'anyone is better than Royal'?
Network Rail are absolutely fucjing cretins
Northumberland Park
Supporters should note that Northumberland Park station will be closed on Saturday. Please make sure to check nationalrail.co.uk to make alternative travel arrangements.
I'm on a mainline into Liverpool Street, it comes from Essex, Suffolk, NorfolkThe entire UK rail system is the same, fudging gouging charlatans the lot of em.
It's an absolute laughing stock compared to other European / modern rail networks.
Agreed if Porro remains out and we'd want to play someone other than Emerson there. Would also give Dragusin a start. Could perhaps also play one of the midfielders there, Bentancur perhaps.Given his appetite for dribbling past opponents and forging forward with the ball, I'm thinking Romero might make a decent RB replacement for Porro. Drop Dragusin in at RCB and let Romero get into those midfield positions he clearly enjoys visiting. If Romero doesn't have the pace of Porro or Royal, Dragusin has a very decent set of wheels and can easily get over to deal with balls played over and behind Romero.
Is there any evidence that Dragusin would be more suited to playing the inverted RB role than Emerson? Is there any evidence that we have someone more suited to the inverted RB role than Emerson who can also perform the defensive duties required?Agreed if Porro remains out and we'd want to play someone other than Emerson there. Would also give Dragusin a start. Could perhaps also play one of the midfielders there, Bentancur perhaps.
I think Ange would just play Emerson again though and can definitely understand that if it happens.
Nope, not really. Though in theory it could be that Romero is more suited to that role, or Bentancur/Bissouma perhaps?Is there any evidence that Dragusin would be more suited to playing the inverted RB role than Emerson? Is there any evidence that we have someone more suited to the inverted RB role than Emerson who can also perform the defensive duties required?
I'm not anti the idea of trying someone else, i'm just not sure who that person is?
I expect he wouldn't continually run the ball into trouble or continually pass it sideways and backwards at a slow pace after taking far too many touchesIs there any evidence that Dragusin would be more suited to playing the inverted RB role than Emerson? Is there any evidence that we have someone more suited to the inverted RB role than Emerson who can also perform the defensive duties required?
I'm not anti the idea of trying someone else, i'm just not sure who that person is?
"EA Sports.. Itziddagay" is how I heard most of them"EA Sport...it's the game"
well i suppose thats technically true as well
Can't we afford an adult microphone?
Are you surprised with this OMT?So looking like No Porro or Richy
So will a fair few in the ground !!If Udogie is back, Emerson will be absolutely fine. What will be really interesting is if Richy isn't fit, as Sonny goes central; Madders will enjoy that.
Good points and agree. More about the lack of balance with Udogie and Porro out than the backup for either being so bad that we can't play with them on the pitch.If Udogie is back, Emerson will be absolutely fine. What will be really interesting is if Richy isn't fit, as Sonny goes central; Madders will enjoy that.
Where did you hear about Richy? Canāt see him mentioned as doubtful anywhere.So looking like No Porro or Richy