Baleforce
Terry Naylor
It didn't. The football was dire and we were lucky to have the points we had. There was no creativity and were only scoring set pieces.
it's not an art project
It didn't. The football was dire and we were lucky to have the points we had. There was no creativity and were only scoring set pieces.
Huh? You said it was a back 5. And yes, it doesn't work, we don't have the players for it. Said it before the game that two in CM would be a disaster.So we agree he plays with three centre backs every matche and it does not work, it fails every match and yet he continues to deploy the same fecking system.
Do we have Kudus and Bergvall back for the next leg? If we can keep it to within 2 we stand a chance if they are back
That's obviously easier said than done. We haven't appointed the right man since Poch all the way back in 2014. What makes you think the next emergency appointment made this season is going to fare any better?How about you just appoint the right person in the first place. Frank was taking us down and so is this clown.
There is zero chance I would have appointed a manger who will start every match with a back 3 come what may.
Do we have Kudus and Bergvall back for the next leg? If we can keep it to within 2 we stand a chance if they are back
Normally my phone would be hopping with messages from mates giving me abuse, not one tonight...Even the gobby Goons I know no longer bother taking the tinkle as we’re such an utter shambles of a club that they now feel sorry for me
View attachment 21841
Just seen the Kinsky incidents.... Pretty much not been involved for so long and literally needed an arm around him. Shocking from Tudor.
Why are we slipping everywhere?
We need them for the PL run in. If we somehow don't lose to Forest and get a few fresh faces back, hopefully that will be enough to scrape the neccesary points for PL survival.Do we have Kudus and Bergvall back for the next leg? If we can keep it to within 2 we stand a chance if they are back
I back 3 on paper but in practice it is a back 5. When we defend I keep on seeing a line of 5 defenders across the back. Bottom line, the same system and it ain't working, back 3 or back 5 is just semantics. It leaves central midfield weekHuh? You said it was a back 5. And yes, it doesn't work, we don't have the players for it. Said it before the game that two in CM would be a disaster.
I don't know why the pundits are going on about Tudor not speaking Kinsky so much. He was brick, I wouldn't bloody speak to him either, especially when you know pretty much no matter what he's never picking Kinsky again in his limited time left.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.