elyid
Dean Austin
They weren’t subbed off so hopefully ok. Think It only counts if you use a concussion subHow do we know if they are enforced into concussion protocols or not?
They weren’t subbed off so hopefully ok. Think It only counts if you use a concussion subHow do we know if they are enforced into concussion protocols or not?
We should all be happy with losing, it's what we've done for the last 2 years.It's ok, you get some people happy with tactical flexibility and losing.
Gotta be a massive ancient burial ground beneath NWHL.I wonder what crimes we committed in a past life to end up supporting this club... Whatever happens - and each week, it gets harder to imagine a happy end - we need a tabula rasa at the end of the season.
If they're concussed, they are out surely. This isn't about the rule - it's whether they are fit to play and if they were concussed tonight, they aren't fit to play.How do we know if they are enforced into concussion protocols or not?
They’re not happy with anything though. Feels like they’re always looking for excuses.
There’s only one thing they should be unhappy with and that’s their own performance week in week out, nothing else matters.
Our players rarely look fit to play these days, so there shouldn't be much of a difference..If they're concussed, they are out surely. This isn't about the rule - it's whether they are fit to play and if they were concussed tonight, they aren't fit to play.
Gotta be a massive ancient burial ground beneath NWHL.
Fuking shambles.
A new manager has to learn - everything we know about the players and squad. That takes time. At least Frank had got a handle on the squad, knew Vicario was the best of the keepers. Had got Xavi playing well and some structure into the side. Thought Tel looked strong and he’s done okay under Tudor tbf. Otherwise why can you say? Fuking shambles!!!
We've given a good account of ourselves not withstanding the giveaways, but if we had played 4 at the back maybe we don't perform as well as we have. As I said I'm no fan of 3 at the back, I actually hate it philosophically but we can't criticise it today because it has actually worked. We've had our chances, we've played reasonably slick football in moments. The system has not been the failure today.
Now Kinsky for Vicario is again something I would never do, but on this very board loads were arguing that Vicario should be dropped so it happening didn't come out of nowhere. Vicario has been frankly brick this season so dropping him isn't theoretically craziness (well it is if you're other option is Kinsky).
With regards to what you're saying about a manager who gets the players, I would suggest that Frank was doing that at the start of the season. He saw how poor we are, how much we lack and so setup to compensate for that, but of course we as a fan base didn't like that. So which do you want it to be? A coach who knows, understands and picks based on our strengths and weaknesses or a someone who just plays what he wants regardless of the fit of the players.
What a cheap, low comment. Throwaway but yeah, not really...studs up, nowhere neart ANY ball I can see...
I'm almost certain that there will be reports of a bust up in the dressing room tonight. I could see players kicking off with him after that.
An interim manager who has lost 4 from 4 and conceded 14 goals along the way whilst clearly tinkling off members of the squad with harsh treatment...IMO there’s no point drawing any conclusions from tonight - we lost because of two slips and a GK fudge-up.
I have alluded to that in the past, I am sure there is something in it. Or was it under that building on the Paxton that held up the build (forget what it was called now), was it a curse??
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.