yiddo37
Alan Hutton
If it had gone to pens Forster should just lay down across the line arms stretched and wave and kick his limbs, be hard to score as he'd almost fill the goalJust aim either side of the tree boys.
If it had gone to pens Forster should just lay down across the line arms stretched and wave and kick his limbs, be hard to score as he'd almost fill the goalJust aim either side of the tree boys.
Are the points won so far written somewhere else? 2 losses în a row don't matter at the start of the season? City finished last year with only 3 losses, are we getting them out of the way early?No one takes notice of the table this early in the season
It's been a mixed start and following on from the 2nd half of last season you can see why there's big question marks about Ange. Unless we plummet and struggle at the bottom end of the table he has to be given the season to see if his philosophy kicks into the side and we improve. We'll either become a fluid, attacking creative side who are great to watch or carry on being a possession based side creating virtually nothing. We'll see...So being 11th în the league after the virtual Brentford win would make you happy with how the season has started?
At least he’s (theoretically) Spurs. Morrison is dripping with bias against us.Jamie O'Hara?
It's a close call
Don't get that at all, Morrison has stated he's Spurs and always tries to big us up. A hard task with the way we play a lot of the times.At least he’s (theoretically) Spurs. Morrison is dripping with bias against us.
Are you on the wind up?So being 11th în the league after the virtual Brentford win would make you happy with how the season has started?
Are the points won so far written somewhere else? 2 losses în a row don't matter at the start of the season? City finished last year with only 3 losses, are we getting them out of the way early?
I am for giving Ange more time, that doesn't mean I can't be happy when the team plays poorly and results aren't what they should be.It's been a mixed start and following on from the 2nd half of last season you can see why there's big question marks about Ange. Unless we plummet and struggle at the bottom end of the table he has to be given the season to see if his philosophy kicks into the side and we improve. We'll either become a fluid, attacking creative side who are great to watch or carry on being a possession based side creating virtually nothing. We'll see...
I belive its flimflam and a bad call to change 8 players for cup games, I get resting players is important but you dont get a flow and the second string dont get a real chance.
Solanke
Odo-bergvald-sarr-gray-Johnson
Udogie-VDV-Dragu-Spence
Vic
Would give Bergvald, Gray, Spence and Dragu a chance.
I belive you dont get any answers changing 8 player other than resting players
All I am saying is true. I don't need to "spin" anything. The table and results are basic math, we are 13th. We lost at home to our biggest rivals and have 2 losses în a row. Played nothing against 14th în the Championship. All of our rivals are above us în the league, again fact.Sorry I thought it was obvious that by saying no one takes notice of the table at this point of the season it would have been clear that position in the table is what was meant.
Dropped points whenever they occur are of course bad, on the flip side of that points won whenever they occur are good - using a hypothetical position in the table 5 games in to the season after hypothetical win as a way of finding a negative is spin is so mind-boggling pathetic that I can't believe someone's actually done it though tbh
He could fool me when it comes to Spurs. His ‘analysis’ is like something you’d hear down the pub.Don't get that at all, Morrison has stated he's Spurs and always tries to big us up. A hard task with the way we play a lot of the times.
I think the idea is to give bench players game time more than resting first 11 players. You can take a look at their current level and when you introduce them as subs during other matches, they have game time under their belt. You would normally think that a mix of first 11 and subs would beat easily a struggling championship team.I really don`t get the resting players thing.I know every prem team does it but as it is so long since we won a trophy I would rather see us start with a strong or virtually first choice 11 and get a lead then bring on the youngsters if we had a good lead, We`ve only played 4 games for goodness sake. I know a lot of our players have a lot of travelling for international games but its not like they have to get up at 6 am every day and do a hard days graft 5 or 6 days a week. I`m pretty sure most on here would have loved to be paid up to a hundred grand a week to play football twice a week and have to be at training at 10 for a couple of hours on the other days
Agreed…but it’s so often not true in cup games. Part of the reason we love them, I suppose.I think the idea is to give bench players game time. You can take a look at their current level and when you introduce them as subs during other matches, they have game time under their belt. You would normally think that a mix of first 11 and subs would beat easily a struggling championship team.
I missed that, but terrible to hear.Seeing Brennan look scared to go and celebrate in front of our fans at the end of the game upset me. Cannot stand the spacegoating of players or how any 'fans' that do this think its going to help in any way. There's a real toxic element or our fan base that really don't help us at all.
That’s exactly what Ange just saidI think the idea is to give bench players game time. You can take a look at their current level and when you introduce them as subs during other matches, they have game time under their belt. You would normally think that a mix of first 11 and subs would beat easily a struggling championship team.