• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Nicolas Jackson

Chelsea have loads of forwards and need to raise money. Bayern have a certain Harry Kane.

Will he be our ‘saviour’…. I doubt it, I don’t think there is anyone we can afford and attract that would be oir ‘saviour’. Would he be a better fit up front for a De Zerbi team than Richi? I think he would yes
Is he a natural #9 or more of a striker in the same type as Tel etc?

He’s incredibly athletic and not succeeding at Chelsea doesn’t make you a bad player (I’m ignoring his Bayern stint as Haaland wouldn’t displace Kane in that team). I’m surprisingly intrigued by this…🤔
 
Is he a natural #9 or more of a striker in the same type as Tel etc?

He’s incredibly athletic and not succeeding at Chelsea doesn’t make you a bad player (I’m ignoring his Bayern stint as Haaland wouldn’t displace Kane in that team). I’m surprisingly intrigued by this…🤔

He didn't succeed at Chelsea under Poch, when Poch got most of that side clicking for 2nd half of that season.

He didn't succeed at Bayern where his role was to allow Kane not be overplayed, and he got starts in unimportant games in an extremely dominant team in that league.

He's a CF that has very poor finishing, which means it's not he's a hold up specialist or someone that really focuses on assisting, he just wastes the chances he gets (data says what the eyes see)

I don't see how he would suddenly be better for us than he has been when playing for arguably better teams
 
Back