• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

New takeover rumours

I am not saying anything I honestly don’t know the answer.

As I see it the club would use that money but outside of the budget ringfenced by fair play accounting.

So we could pay off the stadium debt from the nfl/stadium income and then the football side needs not contribute anything at all if that works for the accountants other positions.

Fair enough but even thats the same thing really isn't it? The club use NFL money to pay off debt of for future construction, still means all other profits left to the footballing side. There will always be bills to pay with the NFL money
 
But when teams like Liverpool and Emirates Marketing Project win them AND finish high up in the league then it shows consistency. Obviously finals are one off games where anything can happen the real big teams do both. In the 90s we weren’t very consistent in the league but we nicked trophies. The 80s was the last decade where we consistently finished at the right end of the table but also won trophies.

No one is arguing that TBF
The top teams can win things
But when we have fans arguing that lesser teams have won more they forgot that it’s cup competitions … ones that we have had chances to win but blown it against, normally against, the first top side we play
 
If that is the definitive answer then that is great news. Spend spend spend.

Think there were also rules about how far ventures had to be from the ground i think. So if Saudi Sportswashing Machine opened a bar outside the ground they can add that. But if they built one in new york, it wouldn't count.

Rules came in years back. So don't remember the details too well.
 
Think there were also rules about how far ventures had to be from the ground i think. So if Saudi Sportswashing Machine opened a bar outside the ground they can add that. But if they built one in new york, it wouldn't count.

Rules came in years back. So don't remember the details too well.
Yeh and even then they are nuanced as City have ventures in Abu Dhabi relating to City specifically which I'm sure I read adds to their commercial.

As long as its not specifically stuff like Oil Fields then there will be allowances
 
No one is arguing that TBF
The top teams can win things
But when we have fans arguing that lesser teams have won more they forgot that it’s cup competitions … ones that we have had chances to win but blown it against, normally against, the first top side we play

I think sometimes it can come across that we’re trying to belittle other teams success. Granted finishing higher in the league shows more consistency but you still have to give teams credit when they win a trophy. When Leicester won the FA cup, the overriding sentiment on here was “oh well it’s only a cup, let’s see where they are in 5 years”. Comes across a bit churlish. And winning trophies does create memories. I was happy when we first finished in the top 4, felt like we had won something. Beating Chelsea in the league cup was also a great memory. Didn’t change my life but was a wonderful time all the same.
 
Fair enough but even thats the same thing really isn't it? The club use NFL money to pay off debt of for future construction, still means all other profits left to the footballing side. There will always be bills to pay with the NFL money

Only in part Grays. But this might explain why we have so much headroom for ffp whilst actually not having the club capital there to exploit it (because of the debt financing) so ffp spending will have to grow organically rather than the club being able to open the floodgates of additional cash we think is sitting there.

Apologies I am thinking and writing to try and reach some sort of deeper appreciation of these matters.
 
Only in part Grays. But this might explain why we have so much headroom for ffp whilst actually not having the club capital there to exploit it (because of the debt financing) so ffp spending will have to grow organically rather than the club being able to open the floodgates of additional cash we think is sitting there.

Apologies I am thinking and writing to try and reach some sort of deeper appreciation of these matters.

No need to apologise for anything pal....its actually a fairly thought provoking point because there must be a line somewhere
 
I think sometimes it can come across that we’re trying to belittle other teams success. Granted finishing higher in the league shows more consistency but you still have to give teams credit when they win a trophy. When Leicester won the FA cup, the overriding sentiment on here was “oh well it’s only a cup, let’s see where they are in 5 years”. Comes across a bit churlish. And winning trophies does create memories. I was happy when we first finished in the top 4, felt like we had won something. Beating Chelsea in the league cup was also a great memory. Didn’t change my life but was a wonderful time all the same.
No one is belittling anyone’s succes
But the context is the key
To win a cup you need luck but you also can’t bottle any game in that comp as your out
The league is harder but has less rewards
 
I think sometimes it can come across that we’re trying to belittle other teams success. Granted finishing higher in the league shows more consistency but you still have to give teams credit when they win a trophy. When Leicester won the FA cup, the overriding sentiment on here was “oh well it’s only a cup, let’s see where they are in 5 years”. Comes across a bit churlish. And winning trophies does create memories. I was happy when we first finished in the top 4, felt like we had won something. Beating Chelsea in the league cup was also a great memory. Didn’t change my life but was a wonderful time all the same.

I think alot of that comes from debate rather than actual statements though. We all wanna win things but some (I include myself in) can also be reflective that any win can't be at the expense of week to week excellence, both should be the aim IMO, not any being at the expense of the other, which is where most of the debates end up.
 
I think alot of that comes from debate rather than actual statements though. We all wanna win things but some (I include myself in) can also be reflective that any win can't be at the expense of week to week excellence, both should be the aim IMO, not any being at the expense of the other, which is where most of the debates end up.
As Ange said, get ourselves into a position where we're challenging for titles regularly.
 
I think alot of that comes from debate rather than actual statements though. We all wanna win things but some (I include myself in) can also be reflective that any win can't be at the expense of week to week excellence, both should be the aim IMO, not any being at the expense of the other, which is where most of the debates end up.
Week to week excellence would mean you would win things, most likely the league so we can all aim and desire that.

Like you say though winning a cup isn't the be all and end all. I want to win or seriously challenge for the league as that's an accurate relay of your actual abilities.
 
Week to week excellence would mean you would win things, most likely the league so we can all aim and desire that.

Like you say though winning a cup isn't the be all and end all. I want to win or seriously challenge for the league as that's an accurate relay of your actual abilities.

It does but the idea that excellence comes in the form of forgoing weekly results and finishing 8th or 9th to win a trophy just because we have been starved of one is at odds for what we should be aiming to do in order to be regularly better as a side
 

Staveley forced to clarify Spurs bid intention after Levy exit​

Amanda Staveley’s privately held vehicle will issue a statement to the stock market amid speculation in the wake of Daniel Levy’s exit as Tottenham Hotspur chairman, Sky News learns.

Amanda Staveley, the former Saudi Sportswashing Machine Football Club joint-owner, will on Monday be forced to clarify her interest in bidding for Premier League club Tottenham Hotspur following veteran chairman Daniel Levy's unexpected departure last week.

Sky News has learnt that PCP International Finance, a vehicle controlled by Ms Staveley, is expected to issue a statement following discussions with the UK takeover watchdog saying that she does not intend to make a formal offer for Spurs.

People close to the situation said on Sunday that Ms Staveley had been in discussions with prospective backers of a bid for the club in recent weeks.

Spurs' ownership is complicated by the fact that it is subject to the UK Takeover Code - governed by the Takeover Panel - because the club is majority-owned by London-listed Enic.

Under the provisions in the Code, PCP could yet return with a formal takeover bid for Spurs if invited to do so by the board of Enic, or if a rival bidder announces its intention to make a firms offer for last season's Europa League winners.

City sources pointed to these caveats as being particularly relevant to Ms Staveley's potential ongoing interest in Spurs.

Enic owns a stake of nearly 87% in the club, with the remaining shares owned by a group of minority investors.

Mr Levy reportedly owns a stake of almost 30% in Enic, while Joe Lewis, Enic's majority-owner, transferred control of his stake in Spurs to his family trust in 2022.

His exit last week after nearly 25 years as Tottenham chairman was apparently driven by a desire to inject fresh momentum into the leadership of the club.

In a statement last week, it said: "Tottenham Hotspur has been transformed over the last quarter of a century.

"It has played in European competitions in the last 18 of 20 seasons, becoming one of the world's most recognised football clubs, consistently investing in its academy, players and facilities, including a new, world-class stadium and state of the art training centre."

Rothschild, the investment bank, had previously been engaged by Mr Levy to raise hundreds of millions of capital to invest in Spurs.

Those discussions are understood to have involved a range of parties in the past year.

Any takeover bid for Spurs, regardless of the identity of the bidder, would be likely to value at well in excess of £3.5bn for it to be deemed acceptable.

A spokesman for Ms Staveley declined to comment on Sunday evening.

 
Ha ha, thousands of words to say that Staveley plans NOT to invest in Spurs.

I do wonder if the guest on The Fighting C*ck was right a few months ago i.e. the Qataris want to buy a big English club in London.
 
I am lost for words here. Staveley has (reportedly) been forced into a corner to release a statement informing the World she has no intention of making or at least leading a bid for Spurs, even though every man and his dog knows she wants to.

Left with the impression there is new owners pulling strings or the Lewis family really are here to stay. Either way, she doesn't need to make such a statement in my view.
 
Ha ha, thousands of words to say that Staveley plans NOT to invest in Spurs.

I do wonder if the guest on The Fighting C*ck was right a few months ago i.e. the Qataris want to buy a big English club in London.
Clarification would be welcome. She has been speaking to the takeover panel but is not making a bid?

Can anyone translate this sort of commercial code?
 
I am lost for words here. Staveley has (reportedly) been forced into a corner to release a statement informing the World she has no intention of making or at least leading a bid for Spurs, even though every man and his dog knows she wants to.

Left with the impression there is new owners pulling strings or the Lewis family really are here to stay. Either way, she doesn't need to make such a statement in my view.

Do they?
 
Back