Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
I thought he had a great game
Ok he didn’t do anything spectacular but he did what he needed too well
Ok he didn’t do anything spectacular but he did what he needed too well
He drove forward strongly with the ball for long distances which was great to see. I think he’s got more of that in him....I thought he had a great game
Ok he didn’t do anything spectacular but he did what he needed too well
He drove forward strongly with the ball for long distances which was great to see. I think he’s got more of that in him....
It was an easy game for him today, but it’s funny that a lot of the criticisms he was getting, like ‘not being able to trap a ball’ and ‘not being able to pass more than 5 yards’ (which were always clearly nonsense) are now being parked for ‘did nothing special today’.
We’re getting somewhere. He’s now at least being viewed as a human being and a footballer.
That’s twice now he’s started as the base 2 in midfield that we’ve been awesome as a team in, the other being Burnley away.
I thought he had a great game
Ok he didn’t do anything spectacular but he did what he needed too well
He has t got great passing to shooting skills that clear but the player I saw tearing us up a few times was all about his direct running, pace and power
Had a great game today
Great game today, indeed. Hope he got some confidence from it and can start to deliver like this when he's called upon.
Interesting thing for me is that he hasn’t had much game time last few games yet still managed to come in and perform like that. My only worry about him being a squad player is that he appeared to be someone who is a confidence player and looked more comfortable once getting a run of games - which to be fair would be same for majority of players. But if he can continue to slot in when called upon like yesterday, as well as come on in games to provide extra legs and shore things up he will be an asset....
I think the quality of the opponent should be a factor, but Swansea were decent for the first 15 minutes or so.
Once our front four got into their stride and stopped getting in each other's way we really were comfortable.
Never easy to say if a team is poor or if they are only as good as you let them be.
Heads went down when we scored. Tried to hit us in the brakes after that but we worked so hard they couldn't get time to pi k out the lone striker.I honestly think it can be both
They were poor but we didn’t let them play either
Never easy to say if a team is poor or if they are only as good as you let them be.
I do appreciate that, and often its very hard to tell. And we as Spurs fans most often struggle to accept its because our team is actually rather good
On this occasion, I think we were as good as we needed to be. Which was, basically, turning up.
Swansea were truly awful. They didnt close down, they didnt press, there was no bite in their team, no aggression...
I genuinely think our youth team would have won that.
Look at Sissoko, as an excellent example, was there more than a handful of occasions where he was even closed down?
Even our forwards barely were, our midfielders basically had the run of the park.
Although I think we should go easy on the praise I also think we need to appreciate that we did a professional job
He was one of the top three performers for us whatever way you look at it and the team played well so....Seriously guys, what the fudge?
"Great"? Really? If ever proof was needed that Sissoko has his own special scale for judging performances...
If Sissoko really was "great" today, I can only assume Eriksens performance was the best in the history of football.
I get positive vibes. I totally accept he was decent today. As posted above though, he had no opposition. And he wasnt even the best player on our side.
And yet those who dont rate him get told they are exaggerating, and that they arent objective or reasonable...
He was one of the top three performers for us whatever way you look at it and the team played well so....
He was very good, certainly better than Dier so if it was just about playing poor opposition why wasn’t he better?I wouldnt have him top 3.
Opinions and all that, but he was just fine - and if you dont count his prior form in the equation - thats it. Just fine.
Obviously if you are looking at his regular standards, and omitting the state of the opposition, then yeah - I suppose you might call him great.
Theres 190 pages in this thread saying thats just not fair though