Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
Exactly why I suggested himimagine the stick Sissoko would have got had the ball come back out behind him
Exactly why I suggested himimagine the stick Sissoko would have got had the ball come back out behind him
True
But imagine if he had brought on say sissoko and he followed through on the ball as it came off the bar
Didn't we beat Yanited this year and Chelski last year when it mattered? What do you want us to do to show winning mentality? Win every game??Those that believe a "fight and will to win" is a WM simply do not understand the concept of a winning mentality. To get to the top of any tree requires more than just this alone. It requires a degree of ruthlessness to win we have so far not exhibited in the really big clutch games. As I have said, to beat Chelsea and United would be a start in demonstrating we have what it takes. Stage two would be to actually win a trophy.
If we continue to not win these sort of games, history will certainly judge us not to have a winning mentality and those that claim we have one now will look like fools.
Didn't we beat Yanited this year and Chelski last year when it mattered? What do you want us to do to show winning mentality? Win every game??
You can always tell when a newspaper has no news and need to fill up space: https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/foot...am-mauricio-pochettino-replace-antonio-conte/
I almost got worked up at the idiocy of the article until I remembered it is April 1...
I almost got worked up at the idiocy of the article until I remembered it is April 1...
I almost got worked up at the idiocy of the article until I remembered it is April 1...
Saw one this morning saying Rsol was coming in as head of recruitment.
1/10 must try harder...
This. We are a team that doesn't need to make subs to change tactics and I think people often miss that when criticizing the lack of earlier subs.I just think it’s this thing that’s gathering steam, and there’s no real nuanced discussion of it. I don’t think it’s ridiculous to suggest a clearly talented Premier League manager under pressure to win an important game wouldn’t consider that he may be more likely to win those points if he made a change, if he thought it possible. The fact that he so clearly doesn’t a lot of the time suggests to me there is something bigger going on.
For instance, we all know that players need to be really in form to play well in a Poch system. The struggles of Wanyama and Rose this year for instance suggest if they aren’t in the groove, they probably won’t be adding that much value.
We change formations and systems in match quite a lot. Maybe Poch prefers that method which can have an element of preparation and rhythm to it rather than potential disruption from subs.
Besides, we often come back to win or draw when we were behind. And we are often always ahead. To pick the games in isolation where we didn’t end up winning doesn’t prove anything.
Maybe it’s part of a strategy based on the fitness work. The idea that if we are fitter, and the players have gotten in to a groove and can have rehearsed certain system changes, then maybe we will be more likely to win than making changes.
I don’t know the answer for sure, because I’m not on his back room staff, but I’m pretty sure there’s a strategy behind it and not some blatant blind spot that only has benefits and no drawbacks, and Poch just hasn’t figured it out yet.
This. We are a team that doesn't need to make subs to change tactics and I think people often miss that when criticizing the lack of earlier subs.
Yes indeed, today it wasn't quite clicking, then he changed it and we looked better, although I don't pretend to know all the tiny changes he and Conte and each player made, to that effect.
I was a bit sus about Son on the right, I tend to find he isnt that useful, much better on the left.
But....
He was bloody good this time, so that shows what I know!