I think Stoke's stats look so good because they are the only team in the league that do not have to play Stoke twice a season.
:ross:
I think Stoke's stats look so good because they are the only team in the league that do not have to play Stoke twice a season.
I agree, until we get affected by any of his foibles it's an open book, though I also agree with Milo that it's interesting to take note of previous criticisms…
I, frankly, don't know what to expect.
I'm looking forward to it, but I must be honest, I am not wildly excited…I hope for the best, but last season really sucked the wind out of sails, and between Bale going and watching that clown disgrace our club, last season was one of the most unedifying I have seen at our club in relation to the potential we have.
Poch needs time. I am not expecting miracles.
I am excited by the new season and the appointment of Poch. I just don't want to see BoL's heart broken again.
I'm looking forward to it, but I must be honest, I am not wildly excited…I hope for the best, but last season really sucked the wind out of sails, and between Bale going and watching that clown disgrace our club, last season was one of the most unedifying I have seen at our club in relation to the potential we have.
Poch needs time. I am not expecting miracles.
I think we're gonna do really well.
Poch has never had the option of playing with a big squad before. He's wanted to play in the way a top club would play, but he's been at smaller clubs. I think with the apparent meticulousness he prepares his training sessions, and his fitness, I think he's well aware of what having a big squad of quality players will do for him. I'd be stunned if he runs the same small group of players into the ground while not integrating others much at all. It would make no sense to take that line and I don't think he will. As for making a like for like sub, it's because that's the type of manager he is. If we want a 'throw a lot of **** at the wall and see what sticks' type approach, we should go back to Sherwood. The system works, it will have its weaknesses as always, but the point of it is that you have been battering a team this way all game and this is what you've trained all week, to suddenly change isn't the done thing.
I think we're gonna do really well.
Poch has never had the option of playing with a big squad before. He's wanted to play in the way a top club would play, but he's been at smaller clubs. I think with the apparent meticulousness he prepares his training sessions, and his fitness, I think he's well aware of what having a big squad of quality players will do for him. I'd be stunned if he runs the same small group of players into the ground while not integrating others much at all. It would make no sense to take that line and I don't think he will. As for making a like for like sub, it's because that's the type of manager he is. If we want a 'throw a lot of **** at the wall and see what sticks' type approach, we should go back to Sherwood. The system works, it will have its weaknesses as always, but the point of it is that you have been battering a team this way all game and this is what you've trained all week, to suddenly change isn't the done thing.
I hope that you are right. I am all aboard the Poch bus. I love your optimism but am a little old and jadded to believe that it will turn out as you think.
I also do not think with subs the choice is just the Sherwood approach or the AVB approach. There are plenty of progressive managers who make tactical changes in game, so I think it is wrong to consider a plan a only coach as the only right way to do things.
I hope that you are right. I am all aboard the Poch bus. I love your optimism but am a little old and jadded to believe that it will turn out as you think.
I also do not think with subs the choice is just the Sherwood approach or the AVB approach. There are plenty of progressive managers who make tactical changes in game, so I think it is wrong to consider a plan a only coach as the only right way to do things.
Serious question does that mean that we will be punching above our weight under or par with it?
I think Stoke's stats look so good because they are the only team in the league that do not have to play Stoke twice a season.
Not sure avb is best described as a clown, charlatan perhaps... I personally prefer... Mr super tactics DVD man.
Tim done alright in tough circumstances.
By the same token I don't think the absolute only subs Poch will make will be like for like. There's probably tonnes of tactical changes in game that fans haven't and won't notice.
I think Stoke's stats look so good because they are the only team in the league that do not have to play Stoke twice a season.
It depends what the squads look like at the start of the season. I would say probably we'd be punching above.
I think Steff was referring to Sherwood as a clown mate! Stats make him look better than he was didn't it? What was our pattern of play under him? Why did we concede so many silly goals? What about the way he conducted himself in front of a camera?
Anyway he's History!
Sorry I didn't explain myself properly, I meant managers that stick to a system regardless of opposition or tactical flow of a said game, are they more or less likely to punch above their weight. For example wenger, an example of a very good manager that sticks to his system, Jose is an example of someone who changes due to circumstance and opposition, perhaps Jose is an example that would be seen as a much better manager than wenger, so let's say rafa then, who again changes due to opposition and circumstance, who in their career would be seen as punching above their weight.
By the same token I don't think the absolute only subs Poch will make will be like for like. There's probably tonnes of tactical changes in game that fans haven't and won't notice.