This is fair.
My question would be;
Was Jose appointed as a short term fix to turn around form, and in the process not expect any action in the transfer market?
Or were Poch’s warnings about the squad taken seriously and the board have appointed Jose to oversee the painful rebuild, but in the process have told him not to expect transfers until the end of the season?
Or is there another option, maybe a blended version of the above 2. Part 1....steady the ship. If that goes well, part 2 will be to make transfers and build your own team (in the close season).
I’d love to know what the gameplan is for the board. With Jose’s comments about no transfers in Jan window, it’s pretty clear they’ve tipped him off that nothing will be going on soon - therefore a painful 2nd half of the season.
We’ve got unfit players, players not trying, players that don’t want to be here, players out of form, players showing ill discipline. Is this the so called new manager bounce?
Granted we turned over West Ham, Burnley and Bournemouth. West Ham fired their manager. Bournemouth are in free fall. Both of those almost came back and drew. Burnley was a decent win. We were fortunate against Wolves, and maybe Brighton. I don’t think we’ve played well since the Burnley game. Shocking against Utd, shocking against Chelsea. Poor against Norwich and Southampton. Absolutely nothing has changed from Poch’s time imo.
I just watched Arsenal, that is a legitimate new manager bounce, 2 decent displays against Chelsea and Utd (unlucky to lose to Chelsea). Players know the mandate and have upped their game, the manager is expected to be there for a fair time. Compare that to us and I have no idea what the plan is for Jose/us.