• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Interim manager thread 2.0

Gutter Boy said:
Just no one steering the ship. AWOL owners. Passive DoF and CEO, who will both be gone soon anyway
Click to expand...
With regards to VV in particular, he showed at his time down the road that he is not trigger happy with managers in the same way Levy was. He further proved that when he kept TF for as long as he did. I don’t expect him to change that pattern now, especially as we are already one week into the three week break.

I am fully expecting Tudor to be in charge for the remainder of the season now.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Honestly, I'd be happy with Dyche truth be told. Couldn't care less what he did or didn't do at Forest, like @Robspur12 has said on a few occasions problem is that we continue to leak goals. If we tighten up, I think that would go a long way towards grinding out enough points to stay up.

I'd back Dyche over most over suggestions for this critical period. But this really needs to happen now, I appreciate Tudors' intimate circumstances but if it's been decided he is not the man they can't waste any more time regardless of most players currently being away on international duty....
 
harr1984 said:
Honestly, I'd be happy with Dyche truth be told. Couldn't care less what he did or didn't do at Forest, like @Robspur12 has said on a few occasions problem is that we continue to leak goals. If we tighten up, I think that would go a long way towards grinding out enough points to stay up.

I'd back Dyche over most over suggestions for this critical period. But this really needs to happen now, I appreciate Tudors' intimate circumstances but if it's been decided he is not the man they can't waste any more time regardless of most players currently being away on international duty....
Click to expand...
Yea he doesn’t set the pulse racing does he, but I also think we just need to find a way to keep it tight, a couple of quick clean sheets, at the very least not lose some of the next few. You can’t win when you’re conceding 3 goals a game.

Still hoping they’ve got someone better lined up though!
 
harr1984 said:
Honestly, I'd be happy with Dyche truth be told. Couldn't care less what he did or didn't do at Forest, like @Robspur12 has said on a few occasions problem is that we continue to leak goals. If we tighten up, I think that would go a long way towards grinding out enough points to stay up.

I'd back Dyche over most over suggestions for this critical period. But this really needs to happen now, I appreciate Tudors' intimate circumstances but if it's been decided he is not the man they can't waste any more time regardless of most players currently being away on international duty....
Click to expand...

I agree that we should move Tudor on asap. This should have been three weeks that the new manager had to get everything in line.

Right now, a week has passed and no changes. I have sympathy for Tudor, and if he is sacked in the next day or two then I will understand the sacking was delayed for compassionate reasons. But there has to be a limit, a time at which he is moved on and the new manager appointed.

Hopefully we’ve been sounding out a manager who will be immediately ready to take over.
 
Gazza Dazzla said:
Yea he doesn’t set the pulse racing does he, but I also think we just need to find a way to keep it tight, a couple of quick clean sheets, at the very least not lose some of the next few. You can’t win when you’re conceding 3 goals a game.

Still hoping they’ve got someone better lined up though!
Click to expand...
He might just get the pulse racing of our players.
Eight games, and we don't look like getting a point!
Forest and West Ham will pick up bits and pieces, probably 7 or 9 a piece, possibly more. I don't see where we get any right now - 4 at a push

We're like Halva - an illusion of solidarity, but crumbles at the slightest pressure
 
First off I hate these "moral guardians" who adopt woke positions towards managers. If saving us from relegation meant the temporary hiring of a chauvinist, or indeed a dubious character of any sort I'd take it in a heartbeat. If it was about being a "decent man", TF would still be here. Second I cannot possibly understand why people are sniffy about Sean Dyche.
So he doesn't fit the "attractive football" mold. Who gives a fig? People need to get real...we need someone who understands the physicality of the PL, and who can stop us shipping goals. Surely Dyche has to be the leading candidate?? We are staring relegation in the face and we have players who can play in Europe but are abject in the PL. I'd welcome the Devil himself if he could get a tune from our players.
 
lurker of old said:
First off I hate these "moral guardians" who adopt woke positions towards managers. If saving us from relegation meant the temporary hiring of a chauvinist, or indeed a dubious character of any sort I'd take it in a heartbeat. If it was about being a "decent man", TF would still be here. Second I cannot possibly understand why people are sniffy about Sean Dyche.
So he doesn't fit the "attractive football" mold. Who gives a fig? People need to get real...we need someone who understands the physicality of the PL, and who can stop us shipping goals. Surely Dyche has to be the leading candidate?? We are staring relegation in the face and we have players who can play in Europe but are abject in the PL. I'd welcome the Devil himself if he could get a tune from our players.
Click to expand...

They pick and chose their battles.

Id rather go down than Dyche though.
 
harr1984 said:
Honestly, I'd be happy with Dyche truth be told. Couldn't care less what he did or didn't do at Forest, like @Robspur12 has said on a few occasions problem is that we continue to leak goals. If we tighten up, I think that would go a long way towards grinding out enough points to stay up.

I'd back Dyche over most over suggestions for this critical period. But this really needs to happen now, I appreciate Tudors' intimate circumstances but if it's been decided he is not the man they can't waste any more time regardless of most players currently being away on international duty....
Click to expand...

My concern about Dyche is less the style of football itself, as for me personally at this point whatever keeps us in the league is ok by me. It’s more, do the players buy in? Frank was supposed to stop us leaking goals and played the most risk averse form of football possible, but the team was just completely brittle as they weren’t bought in.

It might be that the situation is so serious that they find it easier to buy into Dyche’s simplicity for 7 games. Especially if they’ve found Tudor’s system to be too complex to learn midway through a season in a high pressure situation.

But I think the players buying in is my biggest concern. Whatever system we play, we are leaking goals and failing to score enough. I would get behind whichever manager gets the buy in and boosts the confidence, regardless of style.
 
SissokoWasGood (BoL) said:
My concern about Dyche is less the style of football itself, as for me personally at this point whatever keeps us in the league is ok by me. It’s more, do the players buy in? Frank was supposed to stop us leaking goals and played the most risk averse form of football possible, but the team was just completely brittle as they weren’t bought in.

It might be that the situation is so serious that they find it easier to buy into Dyche’s simplicity for 7 games. Especially if they’ve found Tudor’s system to be too complex to learn midway through a season in a high pressure situation.

But I think the players buying in is my biggest concern. Whatever system we play, we are leaking goals and failing to score enough. I would get behind whichever manager gets the buy in and boosts the confidence, regardless of style.
Click to expand...
I'm not so concerned about players buy in at this point. Despite some posters comments about players not caring I do think they are showing they are working to get out of this mess and are actually with Tudor - I'd say there have been improvements but Tudor has got some critical things wrong.

The second reason I'm not concerned is that if certain players don't want to graft under Dyche he will have no problem not playing them which might be just what is needed to get out of this mess. Most managers would play VDV and Romero unequivocally whereas Dyche would have no problem putting Danso in there IMO.

All this being said it appears the Dyche talk is not true and I'd hazard a guess we are most likely sticking with Tudor....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back