Aaarrggghhhh!!!
THAT'S the problem here!
The Beatles = geniuses
The Who = incredible
The Stones = average
…you really don't like The Beatles?
I mean look, when it comes to comedy, I'll grant you that the region has produced poor poor and highly aggravating stand-us such as Tarbuck/Cannon & Ball/Tarbuck/Boardman…
…but music? THE BEATLES? INCREDIBLE! Pretend they're from Gerrard's Cross, oops, I meant Windsor!
Three absolutely legendary and influential bands. However, in my opinion no band has or will ever be as important to contemporary music/musicians as The Beatles.
Is that just a nice way of saying that we can blame the ear-gougingly awful tripe that is pop music on the Beatles?
Is that just a nice way of saying that we can blame the ear-gougingly awful tripe that is pop music on the Beatles?
Prefer London band The Kinks personally
Good to see the admins taking this thread massively off track..
Whatever you feel about the whole thing, 96 people left to go and see a football match 25 years ago, they never came back
RIP
As a 40 year old, he hated being reminded of his age. Hehe
Ha ha, nah, Marky's good mate, he's just angry 'cos he's never heard the bands being discussed! :lol:…all good, Marky can take a dig, always has been able to, a good lad.
Nope.
So many were influenced by The Beatles…from Motorhead to Oasis to Nirvana…wide wide range of influence. In fact, The Stones can lay claim to influencing as much pop as The Beatles, hands down. Their early output was not always dissimilar. It was only when Richards & co decided to wear their drugs like badges that they took the dirty gritty path…no doubt they're a seminal band (X millions of people cannot be wrong) but in terms of musical craft, there can be little to no argument that The Beatles were superior songwriters.
Of course, amidst all this are The Doors…what a group!
It was a damn fine era for incredible music, especially if we stretch to the 70s and Bowie (a personal favorite) and Pink Floyd.
By the way, I hope the Hillsborough 96 families get the answers they deserve…see what I did there? :lol:
Government computers have been used to insert insulting revisions to Wikipedia entries on the Hillsborough disaster. A series of insulting revisions to the site began on the 20th anniversary of the 1989 tragedy, when "Blame Liverpool fans" was anonymously added to the Hillsborough section of the online encyclopedia.
Computers on Whitehall's secure intranet were used again in 2012 to change the phrase "You'll never walk alone" to "You'll never walk again" and later "You'll never w*** alone".
Logs of the IP addresses of computers used to post the revisions revealed they were made by computers based in government departments including the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, the Treasury and the Office of the Solicitor General. The Cabinet Office is now investigating the issue to find out how the revisions were made.
Among the other amendments made from government computers includes changes to the phrase "This is Anfield", which appears above the players' tunnel at the club's ground, to "This is a S***hole". The words "nothing for the victims of the Heysel stadium disaster" were also added to a description of the Hillsborough memorial at the Reds' stadium.
I must admit I've not been following the recent inquest so not sure if what I am saying is correct any more, but from what I've heard/read about the case in the past my understanding is that there was a big police cover up, which tried to gloss over their contribution to the tragedy, but some Liverpool fans were still to blame because ticketless people were trying to get in the stadium. Liverpool fans and the club as a whole still seem to argue that they are entirely blameless here, but surely if there hadnt been so many people without tickets trying to get into the ground, then the police wouldn't have been forced to open the gates to stop pushing being crushed outside? Is this not the case? If the Liverpool fans were partly culpable it would be nice for a spokesperson associated with the club to actually admit that they were partially to blame, rather than just point the finger of blame at everyone else.
The report finds that the safety of the crowd admitted to the Leppings Lane terrace was “compromised at every level”, and there was clear evidence of the failings from previous semi-finals at Hillsborough.
Before the 1981 FA Cup semi-final between Tottenham and Wolves there was a serious crush on the same terrace, in which many people were injured and fatalities narrowly avoided. Following the incident, there was a breakdown in the relationship between Sheffield Wednesday and South Yorkshire Police.
The club refused to accept the seriousness of the incident and held the police responsible. It is apparent the stadium failed to meet minimum safety standards for sports grounds. Proposals to feed supporters from designated turnstiles to specific pens were not acted on because Wednesday’s primary concern was to limit costs. There was a delayed kick-off at the 1987 FA Cup semi-final there and crushing at the 1988 semi-final.
...
1.54 In 1981, following serious crushing at the FA Cup Semi-Final between Tottenham Hotspur and Wolverhampton Wanderers, resulting in injuries to 38 fans, Hillsborough was withdrawn from the FA Cup semi-final list. Tragedy had been averted by opening gates in the perimeter fencing and allowing spectators to sit on the perimeter track.
...
1.64 Reinstated as an FA Cup venue, Hillsborough hosted the Semi-Final between Leeds United and Coventry City on Sunday 12 April 1987. The match was due to start at 12 noon. Approximately 20 minutes before the kick-off, Chief Superintendent Brian Mole, the experienced Match Commander who had written the Operational Order, delayed the kick-off to accommodate spectators from both clubs who had been held up while travelling to Sheffield.
1.65 Despite the sequence of events in 1987, the Operational Order for the 1988 Semi-Final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest provided no contingency plan for delays in travelling to the stadium. While Nottingham Forest supporters had a relatively short journey, this was not the case for those travelling from Liverpool.
1.66 The 1988 match passed without serious incident. There were, however, two issues of significance. First, on approaching the ground spectators recalled being requested by police officers to show their tickets. Second, others, including police officers on duty, remembered being crushed in the central pens, 3 and 4. Police officers closed access to the tunnel once these pens were considered full and fans were redirected to the side pens.
1.67 On 20 March 1989 Liverpool were drawn again to play Nottingham Forest and Hillsborough was chosen by the FA as the most suitable venue. Following a controversial but serious incident, unrelated to his duties as Match Commander, C/Supt Mole was relieved of his duties just three weeks before the Semi-Final and moved to another location. He was replaced by C/Supt Duckenfield, who had minimal experience of managing football matches.
...
1.76 The Operational Order did not provide information or advice about the known bottleneck outside the Leppings Lane turnstiles, nor did it comment on the well-established risk of congestion. These problems were known to SYP and there had been serious congestion the previous year. There were no contingency plans in the Order for delaying the kick-off, as had happened in 1987, for relieving congestion at the turnstiles, for identifying overfull pens or for closing the tunnel, as had happened in 1988.