Fulham
View attachment 10626
Leeds
View attachment 10627
Arsenal
View attachment 10629
City
View attachment 10630
Wolves
View attachment 10630
I’d say your wrong TBH about winks
Our midfield in the two games we have played winks abs Hojdjberg together what’s looked decent actually (admittedly a limited opposition too)
The main reason is they actually can both pass to each other and despite what you saying they do sniff out danger as a pair too
Playing sissoko there is ok but limits out ability to keep the ball and progress via midfield. We have to rely on attacking brilliance
I’ve posted defensive stats for Fulham, Leeds, Arsenal and City. I’d argue sisoako suits us vs city and arsenal because we see him as a defensive contributor... what the stats show is that Hojdjberg in those games is actually doing most of the defensive work
look at the numbers vs Leeds when we played winks with Hojdjberg and we’re arguably playing a more pressing aggressive game.. winks numbers are compatible to his partner (but winks passing numbers that game weren’t high)
Vs Fulham winks did more defensively than Hojdjberg...
and winks passing numbers in that game were very high and he made a lot of passes of all types
So, I’d argue, as I have done for some time, if we’re playing a lesser side we don’t need sissoko starting. He is however very very useful a finisher to kill the game for us (something we’re lacking)
Winks and Hojdjberg at least whilst we don’t have a number 10 (that jose wants) to replace Tanguy so he can drop deeper is our best option by some way. It would only benefit us though if we play an attacking player wide tight too alongside son and Kane
I’ve also added wolves to show you the similarity between winks and Hojdjbergs numbers in a game when they play together and actually made over 60 pass attempts each (comfortably our highest) and in par with Moutinhos passing numbers that game