southstand1882
Mitchell Thomas
Subs
Harry Kane (18.)
Adam Smith (21)
Gio (23)
Thud (25)
Danny Rose (21)
Bongani Khumalo (25)
Harry Kane (18.)
Adam Smith (21)
Gio (23)
Thud (25)
Danny Rose (21)
Bongani Khumalo (25)
Redknapp's teams will always have a higher percentage of older, more experienced players than most, that's what works best for him. He's quite happy to ditch them when they come to the end of their usefulness, even if it means replacing them with another lot of oldies. So long as it continues to work for him season in season out, what does it matter?
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
The fact that Redknapp has increased our wage bill by 50% with his oldies is one of the reasons we have no money for transfers any more.
The fact that Redknapp has increased our wage bill by 50% with his oldies is one of the reasons we have no money for transfers any more.
The fact that Redknapp has increased our wage bill by 50% with his oldies is one of the reasons we have no money for transfers any more.
The fact that Redknapp has increased our wage bill by 50% with his oldies is one of the reasons we have no money for transfers any more.
Subs
Harry Kane (18.)
Adam Smith (21)
Gio (23)
Thud (25)
Danny Rose (21)
Bongani Khumalo (25)
a list of permanent signings made since Redknapp took over :
, Gudjonson
okayyyy
That's simply not true.
Our wages increased significantly last season due to player bonuses from our CL campaign. Our income increased massively as well. We invested heavily when Redknapp took over to get us back on track (note the high amortisation in recent years). As stated by Levy at the time, we cannot spend that much money every season. We might not have ?ú40 million in cash laying around, no businesses do, but when the right players come along we will spend, most likely with short term bank loans.
No one knows how much of that 24m jump is bonuses.
It seems ridiculous trying to get in the competition if the money is instantly fudged down the drain in player bonuses.
Look, I know we could have done so much better if every little detail went our way, but in real life most things don't go your way.
Football in general has tinkled me off so much that I no longer care. All that matters to me is Tottenham and one season without CL football won't change that. If someone turns us down because of that then fudge them. This club is so much bigger than any single ****.
Would love it we would get a nice pay off and then the stupid spurs fans would see him for what he really is especailly if he came back for modric.
I'd much prefer AVB in this case.
Better points per game, better goals scored, better goals conceeded.
All round better manager, plus our player would actually accept him as manager.
Surely it is better to get a loan for six months than get a player you dont want (because the first three or four targets could not be attained)?
In fact its cost saving is it not? Rather than fork out 10m on a player you dont want you just get a guy on half the wages for six months as a temporary stop gap?
A while ago I wanted a specific car but it wasnt available, so I brought a 200 quid run around for three months until the car I wanted was available. i then brought the car I wanted. I didnt fork out 20k on a car I didnt want and suffer depreciation etc.
Same principles. Yet people blame Harry for the high wages yet forget the fact that we have (should have actually) a tonne of money cos Harry wasn't allowed to spunk all on second rate players.
Subs
Harry Kane (18.)
Adam Smith (21)
Gio (23)
Thud (25)
Danny Rose (21)
Bongani Khumalo (25)
I would love to gamble on AVB to, but I fear the UK media has put paid to him working in this country for some time yet...
That's simply not true.
Our wages increased significantly last season due to player bonuses from our CL campaign.