Not picking on you Steff (okay, maybe a bit ...) but this is an interesting thread from post 1.
I'd prefer to leave Pritchard out getting games right now.
Relatively proven (not final product, but at least a season at top level), right wing forward who scores is what we need right now
We could also do with some pace in advanced areas as well. Think its one of our main weaknesses at the moment
Yea I reckon you could have picked any number of posts from a year ago and they'd be saying the similar to Steff there.
I'd look at Kevin Mirallas, 18 months left on his deal, maybe we could tempt Everton.
Levy needs to increase his wages at least up to the level of the likes of Soladado and Lamela. Kane is really carrying our attack, works his bollox off every game, why doesn't he deserve to be close to one of the top earners. He is now a top player. If he was playing for another club and Spurs tried to buy him, he would cost a small fortune. Get on it Levy!!I dunno, the club are usually pretty quick to reward young players who step up their development - i can't imagine his recent contract reflects his rise in standing at the club this season so i wouldn't be surprised to see a further renewal come the summer.
Levy needs to increase his wages at least up to the level of the likes of Soladado and Lamela. Kane is really carrying our attack, works his bollox off every game, why doesn't he deserve to be close to one of the top earners. He is now a top player. If he was playing for another club and Spurs tried to buy him, he would cost a small fortune. Get on it Levy!!
That's why players coming through the ranks are always at a disadvantage. Why should Kane have to wait?If Levy can get two contract extensions out of increasing Kane's wages to the level of Soldado and Lamela that would be much better for the club than just "getting on it" and making him one of our top earners tomorrow.
That's why players coming through the ranks are always at a disadvantage. Why should Kane have to wait?
He is outperforming the big money signings around him. I have nothing against the likes of Bobby and Lamela, but they have really struggled to offer the consistency and performances that Kane is producing so why shouldnt his next contract renewal put him on par with them. Im sure if we tried to bring in Berahino he would want to be paid around 60k a week. Tbh that amount inst even that much anymore with all the money swishing around the game. If I was Kane and his agent that would be the level id expect to be bumped up to.
Just my opinion ion though.
That's why players coming through the ranks are always at a disadvantage. Why should Kane have to wait?
He is outperforming the big money signings around him. I have nothing against the likes of Bobby and Lamela, but they have really struggled to offer the consistency and performances that Kane is producing so why shouldnt his next contract renewal put him on par with them. Im sure if we tried to bring in Berahino he would want to be paid around 60k a week. Tbh that amount inst even that much anymore with all the money swishing around the game. If I was Kane and his agent that would be the level id expect to be bumped up to.
Just my opinion ion though.
I dunno, the club are usually pretty quick to reward young players who step up their development - i can't imagine his recent contract reflects his rise in standing at the club this season so i wouldn't be surprised to see a further renewal come the summer.
If Levy can get two contract extensions out of increasing Kane's wages to the level of Soldado and Lamela that would be much better for the club than just "getting on it" and making him one of our top earners tomorrow.
Because he has 4.5 years left on his current deal. Football, like life, is not always fair. I agree that we shouldn't wait 2-3 years before extending, that seems ridiculous. But for us to offer him more money just because without getting extensions in return when we know how quickly loyalties change in football seems naive and very unfortunate for us as a club.
I see it less as a disadvantage to the player and an advantage to us as a club. It's not all that different to when we sign players on low or reasonable wages from smaller leagues. Why should they have to wait?
I just hope that the club don't take for granted that Kane came through the ranks, is young, a local boy, a Tottenham fan, family are the same etc etc. Early days I know, but finally it looks like we have found a truly top class forward who is going through the early stages of a kind of Bale like meteoric rise. Of course there will always be bigger clubs with shed loads more money that will try to turn his head, but I'm just saying that we on our part should try our best to reward him financially for the stuff he is producing week in week out.
It looks pretty easy being Harry Kane right now. Is there a footballer having more of a ball anywhere in the world than Tottenham’s deliciously irrepressible centre-forward? Here is a player who simply keeps on refusing to find his level, to plateau out, to look down and feel the first little twinge after five months of vertiginous ascent from bit-part midweek man to the most impressive English centre-forward currently playing and one of the stories of the Premier League season so far.
Victories against the league leaders are rare enough but this rollicking 5-3 defeat of a tired-looking Chel53a was a tonic in so many other ways. Not only did it leave Tottenham in fifth place, above Arsenal, this was a win that spoke to a wider clunking into gear of Mauricio Pochettino’s hard-running, hard-pressing methods, executed here by a team with five former youth team players in the starting XI.
Chief among them was Kane, who played the role of goalscorer, folk hero and chief all-round inspirationalist, scoring twice with superbly executed right-foot daisy cutters, winning a penalty in between, setting up another for Nacer Chadli and generally leaving Gary Cahill scrabbling around White Hart Lane like a dazed city-centre reveller, comedy antlers askew, still wondering where the last night-bus home leaves from.
http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2015/jan/01/harry-kane-tottenham-folk-hero-Chel53a
You really think making him one of our top earners now without also extending the length of his contract is the best way to keep him around long term?
You really see no point in 2-3 years from now again being in a situation where we can offer him a significantly increased contract running another 4-5 years?
Edit: And I see absolutely no reason to be worried at all that the club will take anything for granted. Daniel Levy is excellent on these issues.
His current contract is until 2019. Let's say he signs a new one now until 2020 which let's say is double what he is on now, and then just like we did with Bale review and offer an increase every summer which keeps him in line with the top earners at the club. How about that then.
His current contract is until 2019. Let's say he signs a new one now until 2020 which let's say is double what he is on now, and then just like we did with Bale review and offer an increase every summer which keeps him in line with the top earners at the club. How about that then.