• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Financial Fair Play

jts1882 said:
A date cut-off isn't too complicated to understand. They used that to let off PSG, who have gone on to spend ridiculous amounts on transfers. I think UEFA exposed the weakness of their case by picking City over PSG and not going for both.
Click to expand...
I thought they went for City because they got butthurt when those emails were released of City taking the tinkle
 
Away fans could boycott City. Would be symbolic only. But would send a powerful message that people don't like clubs like city taking the pizz.
 
The existence of Santa Claus and unicorns is more believable than FFP rules actually being enforced to prevent financial cheating.
 
Lilbaz said:
Uefa looking to bring in salary cap.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/uefa-salary-cap-ffp-tax-24750262
Click to expand...
It's a smart idea with two major flaws.

  1. The spending cap is still based on turnover, so oil money will still sneak its way in via the backdoor and hire better lawyers than UEFA can compete with
  2. The luxury tax is split between all the other teams in the competition. With an endless supply of money, that will always stretch the oil clubs into the distance. The luxury tax should have the full amount of the overspend going to each and every other club in the competition.
 
scaramanga said:
It's a smart idea with two major flaws.

  1. The spending cap is still based on turnover, so oil money will still sneak its way in via the backdoor and hire better lawyers than UEFA can compete with
  2. The luxury tax is split between all the other teams in the competition. With an endless supply of money, that will always stretch the oil clubs into the distance. The luxury tax should have the full amount of the overspend going to each and every other club in the competition.
Click to expand...

Uefa are not that interested in making the competition more competitive. They want the bigger teams to get further in the competition as more people will watch. But they have to do something about so many clubs being in a financial mess. So if the oil clubs want to back door money through dodgy naming rights deals or whatever, they don't mind that much. As it won't put that club at financial risk.
 
Lilbaz said:
Uefa are not that interested in making the competition more competitive. They want the bigger teams to get further in the competition as more people will watch. But they have to do something about so many clubs being in a financial mess. So if the oil clubs want to back door money through dodgy naming rights deals or whatever, they don't mind that much. As it won't put that club at financial risk.
Click to expand...
And, of course, take their cut from the luxury tax.
 
Raziel said:
hahaha ... these fudging guys wipe their ass with FFP

https://twitter.com/x/status/1425390433186861062
Click to expand...

E8mQwSSVEAMQhYa
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back