braineclipse
Steve Sedgley
Wouldn't have to be something in his game that means he's not suited to the role. More that it's a different role he's not used to. And him being brilliant at CB, there's several potential downsides to moving him even if he's seen as suited to that role too.Yep I'm not going to moan if I don't see it, there's a chance that Ange might have seen something in training or in Romero's game to say actually he's not suited to it. The thing is he often goes on rampages all over the pitch whether he's meant to or not, and the guy has the technique to play all over and be effective, this way there's in theory be adequate cover behind him....
I do think Romero would have crushed it being the Dier of Poch's system where we switched between a back 3 and the CCB pushing in to midfield depending on whether we had possession.
It's just good to have options I guess, we haven't signed a 30 m CB in January just to sit on the bench but the way we collect injuries it's unlikely the VDV / Cuti partnership will be ever present.
We didn't sign Dragusin just to sit on the bench, and he won't. As you say probably there will be injuries or suspensions. And we just needed another option there too. Could be good to see out games. It does give us options, but to me 3/5 at the back seems like a more likely option than Romero in midfield. And I don't think we'll see that either from the start of this game.