Baleforce
Arthur Rowe
at his peak the greatest of his generation, I'm a massive fan
thats fair, but there isn't a keeper in the modern game you can't say that about
keeping is a lost art
I don't think anyone outside of Leicester seriously believes Vardy is better than Kane as Kane has shown he's more than a one season wonder. But Vardy looks fresher and is getting into the right positions, Kane just isn't putting himself about enough.
Tend to agree with this, in the last three England games Kane has been a shadow of himself. I would like to see more of Sturridge as well.
What's your point?
Look you don't have to tell me how good Lineker was because as a kid he was my favourite player and I only started supporting Spurs after he joined the club.I've yet to see anything to show me that Vardy is likely to end his career even being considered an OK player, let alone mentioned as being similar to Lineker.
As @galeforce said, had that ball come off an English head we'd all be saying how stupid he was to be stood there.
That he's getting f*ck all service - or useful service?
Did not stop Vardy or Sturridge scoring, i love Kane but i am not going to make excuses for him having poor games in his last three outings.
It's not the mouth thing. He has never been quick but he looks really leggy right now. When on top of his game he is much sharper in closing down the opposition. Also his touches seem lazier, lay offs looser.He always looked knackered mouth wide open gasping the air in. Thats Harry Kane.
He got twice as many touches as fresh Vardy.
True. And I am not a blind-eyed apologist for him either. 'Everyone has an off day (or number of days) and it shouldn't be used to slate him. But Vardy and Sturridge did not have to rely on Sterling either. I would have liked to see Kane given a bit longer after Sturridge replaced Sterling. But we won and for once we can't criticise Hodgson for being overly cautious. So I am happy. Hopefully Harry will get another chance against Slovakia.
I'm sorry but Roy made a massive fudge up in both his team selections so far, can't believe I'm reading all this well done Roy cobblers!?
It's quite clear to anyone whose ever watched a football match that sterling shouldn't be anywhere near this team at the moment and even clearer after the Russia game, yet Roy starts him in both? It was like playing with 10 men in both games, then low and behold he subs him with Vardy and we suddenly look good, what a surprise!
Trouble is he took Kane off as well and denied him the opportunity of playing in a team with 11 players and a bit of support up there. Sturridge was playing no better than Kane did before the goal and fair play to him for that great goal, but had he not scored i think we'd be reading a different narrative of his performance. I think he's a good player by the way and id be so tempted to start Sturridge myself as well, but put him up top on his own with lallana and sterling off him and see how well he does?!?
Kane's being made a escaped goat for Roy's pathetic team selection.
Sorry mate but you the one who is talking cobblers, but Stop! Hammer time.
What bit don't you agree with?
The trouble is people are so influenced by "the story" that the media feed them and Roy changing the game with his subs is today's story.
Pretty much all of it.
No the trouble with some people is that because Kane " is one of our own" some fans are blinded to the fact that he has been below his best in his last three games for England. Its not against the law to say that " one of our own" has played below his ability.
Did not stop Vardy or Sturridge scoring, i love Kane but i am not going to make excuses for him having poor games in his last three outings.