• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ENIC

Didn't see any flags at the game or hear any ENIC out chants even in a poor 1st half perhaps because I am quite a long way from the south stand , you have to ask how much support CFT have among the fanbase and who do they propose put in a £4 billion bid for the club.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I know many will say that Danso & Tel were last season transfers but when accounts for the current season come out they will be shown as 25/26 transfers on the books. If you believe Transfermkt figures then outlay for the summer & winter windows is 183 million euros.

PS Moaning and groaning on every Spurs forum everwhere but as far as I can see not accounting for inflation this season has seen the highest net outlay ever on transfers.

transfers 03022026 090046.jpg
 
Last edited:
Didn't see any flags at the game or hear any ENIC out chants even in a poor 1st half perhaps because I am quite a long way from the south stand , you have to ask how much support CFT have among the fanbase and who do they propose put in a £4 billion bid for the club.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Limited flags!
Bloody penny pinchers, we want flags for everyone.
I'm starting a CFT out campaign, this lack of ambition and unwillingness to put their hand in their pockets is a disgrace and an afront to our great club.
 
I know many will say that Danso & Tel were last season transfers but when accounts for the current season come out they will be shown as 25/26 transfers on the books. If you believe Transfermkt figures then outlay for the summer & winter windows is 183 million euros.

PS Moaning and groaning on every Spurs forum everwhere but as far as I can see not accounting for inflation this season has seen the highest net outlay ever on transfers.

View attachment 21532

So what?

- That is par or slightly above for our spend since Covid (Conte got the most, then Ange got the most, now Frank)
- Revenue streams are increasing

But more than that (as I said in transfer thread), the owners are the ones who keep saying they have money. If you keep saying you will spend (conveniently in September and December) and don't, yes you will get fans angry.

And that isn't even acknowledging the team is in trouble both results and injury wise. Even if we didn't have money, there would be a significant argument that we should go to the well (borrow/raise capital) to buy our way out of trouble, minimise the risk, try to save season.

Once again, they have said they want success on field, that they understand things need to change (spend/wages), if they don't have the funds to do it, sell up and go
 
So what?

- That is par or slightly above for our spend since Covid (Conte got the most, then Ange got the most, now Frank)
- Revenue streams are increasing

But more than that (as I said in transfer thread), the owners are the ones who keep saying they have money. If you keep saying you will spend (conveniently in September and December) and don't, yes you will get fans angry.

And that isn't even acknowledging the team is in trouble both results and injury wise. Even if we didn't have money, there would be a significant argument that we should go to the well (borrow/raise capital) to buy our way out of trouble, minimise the risk, try to save season.

Once again, they have said they want success on field, that they understand things need to change (spend/wages), if they don't have the funds to do it, sell up and go

You really have to wonder why the club made the effort to put out all that PR pre-window about the 'need to change' re spend/wages and then not actually show that things have changed. It seems such a massive own-goal compared to if they said nothing or gave a bland "we will try and boost the squad if it is possible" message.
Had something changed in such a short time?
Did they think such a message would enable more bums on seats in the shot term (they are surely losing loads at the moment with the seats that are not being taken up etc)?
Did they expect an injection of funds in January that has since been held back for some other reason?

Just seems like own goal after own goal atm...
 
You really have to wonder why the club made the effort to put out all that PR pre-window about the 'need to change' re spend/wages and then not actually show that things have changed. It seems such a massive own-goal compared to if they said nothing or gave a bland "we will try and boost the squad if it is possible" message.
Had something changed in such a short time?
Did they think such a message would enable more bums on seats in the shot term (they are surely losing loads at the moment with the seats that are not being taken up etc)?
Did they expect an injection of funds in January that has since been held back for some other reason?

Just seems like own goal after own goal atm...

I guess there's two approaches. The Glazers or Mike Ashley, who just shamelessly screw over clubs and seem to enjoy the bad PR. Or the Jim Ratcliffe and others, who package it with empty words and platitudes, but still do the same thing. I guess the Nepos are the latter.
 
Back