braineclipse
Steve Sedgley
The stat isn't trying to do anything, it's just a stat. May claim that the person tweeting that, or making that infographic is trying to do that, but it's difficult to judge intent here.You think Nunez, Diaz & Jota are better at converting chances than Son & Richarlison?
The stat is trying to create some equivalence between Salah & Kulu, and it makes no sense, and that doesn't meant Kulu is brick, just a very bad comparison, Salah is an elite level player
To @Bedfordspurs point, Salah is a more a Son player, would you really believe any stat that says Kulu is better/equal to Son?
What that stat shows is that Kulu is creating a very good number of chances. Noting more, nothing less. Without saying anything about the quality of those chances or imo the quality of each player at creating chances relative to each other.
If Kulusevski, and the team in general, can turn more of those into higher quality chances that would be better. But creating a very good number of chances is also a good thing.