Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
Yea I’ve seen some of thoseYou've gotvanother series where managers explain their tactics.
They are great
Yea I’ve seen some of thoseYou've gotvanother series where managers explain their tactics.
Levy has hired a director of football, or whatever it is called this year (as he has many times before over the years). He's gone through all kinds of managers to set us up for success, but all have failed. He has bought a lot of expensive players, and we arguably spend more than other teams on players now - all thanks to how well we're run economically. He built the greatest stadium in the world that makes brickloads for us.
What exactly is it, according to the haters, that he does wrong? Is he just someone who sits at the top and is therefore easy to blame? What chairman that you know of does a better job? And how?
I just don't get the Levy hate everytime we're bad. What exactly is he doing wrong? How could anyone do it any better? Is he just hiring the wrong people? Is that it?
As has been said many times, he’s a great chairman in terms of the commercial side, not so much on the football side. He’s been at the club 20 years, it’s time for a change. How many top companies have someone in charge for 20+ years? Kinda stating the obvious but he runs the club so he is responsible when we are successful and when we are not.
I've heard it mooted that Levy's successor will be a Levy. Has he been grooming his own son for years to take over at the helm?
He’s obviously done outstanding things on the commercial side, and in raising our profile worldwide.Levy has hired a director of football, or whatever it is called this year (as he has many times before over the years). He's gone through all kinds of managers to set us up for success, but all have failed. He has bought a lot of expensive players, and we arguably spend more than other teams on players now - all thanks to how well we're run economically. He built the greatest stadium in the world that makes brickloads for us.
What exactly is it, according to the haters, that he does wrong? Is he just someone who sits at the top and is therefore easy to blame? What chairman that you know of does a better job? And how?
I just don't get the Levy hate everytime we're bad. What exactly is he doing wrong? How could anyone do it any better? Is he just hiring the wrong people? Is that it?
It’s why I’d back pool to win the titleHe’s obviously done outstanding things on the commercial side, and in raising our profile worldwide.
As others have said, though, there have been way too many poor decisions on the footballing side. Constantly giving managers players other than those they really want; failing to make the push to the next footballing level when we’ve been well placed to do so (have we really moved on in that area since the switch to the new stadium?); a lack of long-term planning, which has seen us career from managers with a particular style to others who play in a completely different way…
Recent specific examples for me of how our decision making at the top level continues to be flawed would be our failure to replace Kane for an entire season, and the re-signing of Werner, a player who I feel really symbolises our acceptance of the ‘that’ll do’ mentality which doesn’t exist at clubs which really are top level. The current squad is unbalanced, and we have been crying out for a leader on the pitch for years but still don’t have one.
I do understand it’s complex, though, and I don’t really want to be owned by serial human rights abusers or Elon F ucking Musk.
We've been consistenly one of the biggest spenders. The type of player that we need to challenege and is ready now command really big fees and are most likely going to have more attractive offers than us. Our best route if to buy players before they become the ready made player that the big boys will snap up.I guess if there is a valid criticism it might be that even now, we are not spending enough. Solanke looks an excellent purchase. But if we are to challenge, we need more "players for now". And that means not signing Werner but paying more for the version of Werner who also scores. Buying players for the future, like Bergvall, is a risk. He's clearly not ready to play for the first team but he occupies a first team space. Watching the Jose video, and the names on the park for Inter and for Barcelona, or indeed the players on Galatasaray's team, you realise what the gulf is from our first 11 to a truly competitive first 11.
And no team other than city have gone big until they address their other issues firstWe've been consistenly one of the biggest spenders. The type of player that we need to challenege and is ready now command really big fees and are most likely going to have more attractive offers than us. Our best route if to buy players before they become the ready made player that the big boys will snap up.
It's about both, getting the best players for the system. Peps system wouldn't work without top class players. And Haaland is the best goalscorer, not the best player.Going big isn't the answer anymore, its about systems and squads.
The best player in the PL right now is probably Haaland, but even he can't make up for Guardiola's tactical meltdowns.
He’s obviously done outstanding things on the commercial side, and in raising our profile worldwide.
As others have said, though, there have been way too many poor decisions on the footballing side. Constantly giving managers players other than those they really want; failing to make the push to the next footballing level when we’ve been well placed to do so (have we really moved on in that area since the switch to the new stadium?); a lack of long-term planning, which has seen us career from managers with a particular style to others who play in a completely different way…
Recent specific examples for me of how our decision making at the top level continues to be flawed would be our failure to replace Kane for an entire season, and the re-signing of Werner, a player who I feel really symbolises our acceptance of the ‘that’ll do’ mentality that doesn’t exist at clubs which really are top level. The current squad is unbalanced, and we have been crying out for a leader on the pitch for years, but yet we still don’t have one.
I do understand it’s complex, though, and I don’t really want to be owned by serial human rights abusers or Elon F ucking Musk.
That's interesting.
You'd have to think that it will start paying off over the long term, Especially with all the financial fair play rules we have now.
ps. I always thought the Yankees were a huge business, Everyone and their dog has a NY baseball cap
Yeah I realised after I posted!. Hasn't helped the Knicks much either hey lolI’m also a Cowboys fan.
It has not paid off over the long term.
Unless you're gonna be bankrolled by a benefactor, increasing the clubs money making abilities is key to any hope of long term sustained success - we've only been on the map financially for the last couple of years, so it's now down to the club to turn that in to something tangible.