• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Cristian Romero

Fair points, but i still think under Dzerbi he can get him playing to his full ability and if he can do that we will have a top player.

He would walk into a starting position on a United team that just came 3rd, and probably easily be their best defender.

Still think he's gone, we are going to have two incoming CBs (early) plus Vuskovic to navigate, doesn't make sense unless we knew we had sales.
 
He would walk into a starting position on a United team that just came 3rd, and probably easily be their best defender.

Still think he's gone, we are going to have two incoming CBs (early) plus Vuskovic to navigate, doesn't make sense unless we knew we had sales.

Your are probably right about him going, sad though imo.
 
The PGMOL have it in their heads that he is a dirty player because he is a dirty player. As others have mentioned, he’s got away with many fouls in the past, the refs just aren’t willing to give him the benefit of the doubt anymore. Romero and Spurs should worry about Romero cleaning up his act, if he does that and the refs still send him off then perhaps we’d have a gripe. But pointing the finger at everyone else won’t solve the problem.

But PGMOL should not have any pre-conceived thoughts of this type. Their job is to be neutral, step on that pitch and uphold the laws of the game. What happens in your logic when PGMOL have it in their heads that Van Dijk isn't a dirty player. Do they make a different decision for Romero as they would for VVD when they do exactly the same thing?

This is the crux of the matter in hand.
 
But PGMOL should not have any pre-conceived thoughts of this type. Their job is to be neutral, step on that pitch and uphold the laws of the game. What happens in your logic when PGMOL have it in their heads that Van Dijk isn't a dirty player. Do they make a different decision for Romero as they would for VVD when they do exactly the same thing?

This is the crux of the matter in hand.

But we have enough evidence that this does happen, in the same weekends, in almost frame by frame comparisons, and the data backs it up.

- VVD and Gabriel get away with murder compared to Romero
- Smaller players on Spurs side (Gil, Xavi) simply don't get the calls/protection say Grealish got at City, or Saka gets for Scum, lets not even talk about Vic.

I would hesitate to say we are being cheated against, but when one team gets no penalties for them all season (and no away penalties in 3 seasons) while 13 other teams in the league have gotten at least 4, 7 have got more than 6, there is an issue.

Make no mistake, ref's are affected by SAF/Wenger, now Arteta/Klopp's tirades and letters to PMGOL, the real corruption/incompetence question lies around VAR, even if the on field ref is under pressure by occasion/crowd/club, the whole point of VAR is an official not even at the ground, with time and resources to make the right call, ye somehow, time and time again, they fudge up.
 
Back