would be interesting to see first XI's with these signings - for example where do you plan on playing Kane, Pirate, if we're spending 30m on Benteke? is it safe to assume you'd be playing him behind/off of Benteke - in that instance how does that effect the rest of the attacking positions?
if i had 50m to spend it wouldn't be on 3 first XI players as i think, bar one or two positions, we're ok - once we sorted the first XI around November time we started to look a lot better and had a good 20 or so league game run up until the cup final, from which we tailed off and our defensive frailties were exposed and our lack of squad options became a hindrance as we overplayed the clearly flagging young first team players. so with that in mind i think 50m would be best spent fixes those problems - by signing a partner for Bentaleb (Schneiderlin) two new forwards to back up Kane (Austin and Lambert or Ings and Berahino?) some competition for the wing forward positions - (Ayew/Konoplyanka?) and quite possibly this Trippier fella as in light of Walker missing 60% of the season im not sure Yedlin is ready to be relied upon that much
which would leave us looking like this :
Lloris (Vorm)
Walker (Trippier) Vertonghen (Dier) Fazio (Wimmer) Rose (Davies)
Bentaleb (Carroll) Schneiderlin (Mason)
Ayew (Lamela) Eriksen (Alli) Chadli (Pritchard)
Kane (Austin/Lambert)
and would hopefully address the defensive problems and give the manager much better options to rotate/replace throughout the season and juggle the various competitions
Spotted a slight flaw.Billy, you really haven't taken on board the point I've now made several times, in several different ways. A top new striker does not necessarily preclude playing Kane. What it does is give us much needed OPTIONS up front, whereas currently we have one and only one. I really hope Kane has the same sort of season, but I think we need to plan for all striking scenarios. With Benteke, this gives us the same way of playing if Kane is injured, tired or off- form. Further, it gives us the option to play two up top ( my prefered option for lesser opponents) either from the start or if plan A isn't working, or indeed go 42311 with Kane playing off Benteke. Remember Poch used Lambert like this at Soton. He is just what we need to offer these varying options.
Spotted a slight flaw.
Billy, you really haven't taken on board the point I've now made several times, in several different ways. A top new striker does not necessarily preclude playing Kane. What it does is give us much needed OPTIONS up front, whereas currently we have one and only one. I really hope Kane has the same sort of season, but I think we need to plan for all striking scenarios. With Benteke, this gives us the same way of playing if Kane is injured, tired or off- form. Further, it gives us the option to play two up top ( my prefered option for lesser opponents) either from the start or if plan A isn't working, or indeed go 42311 with Kane playing off Benteke. Remember Poch used Lambert like this at Soton. He is just what we need to offer these varying options.
would be interesting to see first XI's with these signings
Ha ha! Quite right. Make that 41311. We don't need two DMs against park the bus types.
-------------------------------------Lloris/Vorm
Walker/Yedlin----Fazio/Wimmer--Vertonghen/Dier--Rose/Davies
---------------------Bentaleb/Cambiasso-------Mason/Alli
--------------------------------------Eriksen/Pritchard
-----------Lamela/Townsend----------------------Chadli/Ayew
-------------------------------------Kane/Ings
Looks like you and I have similar wants for our squad next year. I too would be (very) happy with Trippier as a back right back option. The reason that I went for Austin as the CF choice is because of all the strikers I've seen he looks to have the game that is most similar to Kane's. I think we will play enough games next year to allow both of them to get enough games (and I think in certain games we could play Kane as number 10 behind Austin).would be interesting to see first XI's with these signings - for example where do you plan on playing Kane, Pirate, if we're spending 30m on Benteke? is it safe to assume you'd be playing him behind/off of Benteke - in that instance how does that effect the rest of the attacking positions?
if i had 50m to spend it wouldn't be on 3 first XI players as i think, bar one or two positions, we're ok - once we sorted the first XI around November time we started to look a lot better and had a good 20 or so league game run up until the cup final, from which we tailed off and our defensive frailties were exposed and our lack of squad options became a hindrance as we overplayed the clearly flagging young first team players. so with that in mind i think 50m would be best spent fixes those problems - by signing a partner for Bentaleb (Schneiderlin) two new forwards to back up Kane (Austin and Lambert or Ings and Berahino?) some competition for the wing forward positions - (Ayew/Konoplyanka?) and quite possibly this Trippier fella as in light of Walker missing 60% of the season im not sure Yedlin is ready to be relied upon that much
which would leave us looking like this :
Lloris (Vorm)
Walker (Trippier) Vertonghen (Dier) Fazio (Wimmer) Rose (Davies)
Bentaleb (Carroll) Schneiderlin (Mason)
Ayew (Lamela) Eriksen (Alli) Chadli (Pritchard)
Kane (Austin/Lambert)
and would hopefully address the defensive problems and give the manager much better options to rotate/replace throughout the season and juggle the various competitions
I think the problem is that there aren't too many of those out there.... I think Berahino would be a possibility here though.IMO we need to sign a number 9 who can also play LF, RF or number 10. This way we can buy a quality first teamer that doesn't inhibit Kane's development, be that as a number 9 or 10, and can step in if Kane is injured/rested. Any forward who spends time on the bench is likely to suffer with confidence/match sharpness, or is not good enough in the first place.
I wouldn't like our chances at all if Kane was out injured.... Ings looks to be more of a 4-4-2 type second forward to me so would be a partner for Kane, instead of a replacement for him?.... Or do you think that Poch is going to change to 4-4-2?... In which case surely we need at least one true wide player?-------------------------------------Lloris/Vorm
Walker/Yedlin----Fazio/Wimmer--Vertonghen/Dier--Rose/Davies
---------------------Bentaleb/Cambiasso-------Mason/Alli
--------------------------------------Eriksen/Pritchard
-----------Lamela/Townsend----------------------Chadli/Ayew
-------------------------------------Kane/Ings