That’s fine you’re right I dont fully understand the gun laws, but to me to say he “interefered with them” is just a cheap way of finding an offence he committed.
When you watch that video, he shouts a it in protest of the way in which they are treating another person, these ICE blokes then go and start shoving another person and he steps in to help them. If that gets put up that he’s causing an offence and “interfering with them” then I’m sorry, but that’s incredible cowardice from the legal system in America and basically covering up.
That just means the minute someone goes to a protest they commit an offence as there will always be a “they shouted” “they swore” “they called me a mean name”.
Regardless, I’ll take your word on it as you are obviously more clued up on American gun laws than me. However, to me, that’s nothing other than a trigger happy ICE agent who murdered that man because he wanted to shoot someone, and took a cheap opportunity to do so. There was no threat, any half decent risk assessment would have told him that when he has that many people around him. The man died because those agents WANTED to kill him, not because he was a threat or committing a serious offence. I know murder requires the intent as well, but honestly at this point, I think these ICE agents go out looking for any reason available. They’re playing soldiers.