• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

American politics

Technically not treason I guess, but those pardoned as part of the Russia investigations are potential co-conspirators. This has to be challenged in court.

He is a traitor to his country, needless to say.
The presidential pardon is absolute - the only form of recourse is electoral and that's already done. If he really wanted to fudge things up, he could pardon the entire prison population on his last day but that would mean pardoning lots of black people so he won't do that.

If he's committed a crime in the process of a pardon - like taking a bribe for it, then that can be charged separately, but he can always just pardon himself on the way out of the door.

He'll get charged for state crimes though.
 
The presidential pardon is absolute - the only form of recourse is electoral and that's already done. If he really wanted to fudge things up, he could pardon the entire prison population on his last day but that would mean pardoning lots of black people so he won't do that.

If he's committed a crime in the process of a pardon - like taking a bribe for it, then that can be charged separately, but he can always just pardon himself on the way out of the door.

He'll get charged for state crimes though.
How absolute is yet to be tested in court. Self pardon would mean that the president is above the law. That'll be challenged at a minimum. Wiser to resign and get Pence to do it.
 
How absolute is yet to be tested in court. Self pardon would mean that the president is above the law. That'll be challenged at a minimum. Wiser to resign and get Pence to do it.
Self pardon will.be challenged, I'm sure but the language is fairly clear. It's one of the simplest laws in the US legal system as there are no caveats.
 
Self pardon will.be challenged, I'm sure but the language is fairly clear. It's one of the simplest laws in the US legal system as there are no caveats.
It was something Nixon contemplated but did not try after advice. Back then the OLC opined that a presidential self-pardon wouldn't be constitutional under the fundamental rule that no one may be a judge in his own case. The supreme court, even with 3 Trump judges, would never be as bold as to side with Trump on this. The precedent that the president is above the law would scare even the right-wing zealots on the court. Taken to an extreme you could kill your political opponents and pardon yourself.
It'll be interesting to see where this goes, and the choice of AG will be a signal how hard Biden wants to play it against Trump and his cohorts.
 
Last edited:
It was something Nixon contemplated but did not try after advice. Back then the OLC opined that a presidential self-pardon wouldn't be constitutional under the fundamental rule that no one may be a judge in his own case. The supreme court, even with 3 Trump judges, would never be as bold as to side with Trump on this. The precedent that the president is above the law would scare even the right-wing zealots on the court. Taken to an extreme you could kill your political opponents and pardon yourself.
It'll be interesting to see where this goes, and the choice of AG will be a signal how hard Biden wants to play it against Trump and his cohorts.
The case law lies with the ability to self pardon. Historically there have only been two or three occasions where this has happened and both were lawful.

This is worth a listen for further info:
https://openargs.com/oa90-pardon-yes-donald-trump-can-pardon/
 
Back