He lost me at his pronunciation of Crimea
He lost me at his pronunciation of Crimea
The guy in the videoWhose pronunciation?
The guy in the video
Pronouncing it crim (as in criminal) ea rather than "cry" mea
I must say i'm generally puzzled by the chemical attack and the reasons for it; like @the dza says it simply doesn't make sense for Assad to do that to his people now, especially at a time when Trump said that he saw Assad as an ally in the fight against ISIS!
The old cynic in me then starts to look around for some explanation for the oddity of the incident, in a least its timing and clearly suicidal nature from even a purely PR point of view, and i start to ask: who benefits from the incident?
Your over thinking things, the guy is crazy and does not see his people as human beings, history is littered with such people.
The guy in the video
Pronouncing it crim (as in criminal) ea rather than "cry" mea
Your over thinking things, the guy is crazy and does not see his people as human beings, history is littered with such people.
Your over thinking things, the guy is crazy and does not see his people as human beings, history is littered with such people.
I think I might be being a div - i just watched the videoThe far right nutjob? The article is about them not by them.
I think you are being too simplistic; he's not isolationist Kim Jung-Un and has local allies in Iran and some allies in Palestine. He doesn't NEED to gas his own people to keep his gang together and let's face it: is he any more "crazy" that the leaders of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the like? Or more "crazy" than Putin? Than Trump?
Ok maybe that last part is a bit harsh, but you get my point; somebody in that position of power and in that region doesn't need to do such a crazy act at such a time when they were not the biggest pariah in the world by a long shot