• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

American politics

loss_for_words.gif
 
This is not Democratic peaceful protest. This is Leftist Fascism.

The Republican second term is almost assured.
 
Last edited:
This is not Democratic peaceful protest. This is Leftist Fascism.

The Republican second term is almost assured.


Ever considered the possibility that Bannon is behind paid agitators? You know, so as people think it is , err, 'leftist fascism'? And before you start requesting I wear a tin-hat, look at the modern history of regime change in Central America and the Middle East...
 
In truth, there is no comparison on left or right when it comes to ignorance. There is no shortage of stupidity no matter what side you're on. However, Globalist Liberal/Leftists are something else.

I think it's all to easily forgotten that there was only a choice between Trump and Clinton. The choice as always, was manipulated. However, I think the best option was to go with Trump rather than four more years of Democrat rule.

The national debt had doubled in the eight years under Obama, from $10,000,000,000,000 to $20,000,000,000,000...These numbers are not billions but trillions!

The policy of ever expanding big government to deal with it's own messes had to be stopped in it's tracks.

To much Democrat hogwash, creating their welfare plantations. Telling people that they're not worthy of a future but not to worry, the good old Democrat Party will look after them with the tax monies of the hard working.

Capitol Hill socialising Wall Streets losses, whilst increasing food stamps and other welfare benefits for the poorer people. Aided by the complicity of the main streeeam news outlets and their "expert contributors," keeping the dumbing down of the masses policy running at optimum levels.

The hard working 20's and 30's , are working harder but making no financial improvement in their lives, faced with education debts, living at home with their parents.

Obama's "Change" right?

And what of academia.

A voice speaks out offering a different way, and it's immediately branded racist, anti semitic, islamophobic, homophobic, anti woman and just about any other slur imagined.

The education system has been taken over by cultural marxists hell bent on pushing their agenda, turning their pupils into entitlement cultists.

It's so sad that the current generation of young people were allowed to grow up in a world where the globalist control every word they hear in the schools. They control the music industry. They control Hollywood. They control the mainstream news networks. They control TV. They control the radio. They control the politicians. This is why nearly every college age kid in the UK, USA and in the EU is utterly devoted to furthering the globalist agenda. To see so many kids so utterly and fanatically driven to further the establishment agenda, you'd have to look back all the way to the Hitler Youth to find an accurate parallel.

The only hope for future generations is for us to continue the good fight against Globalism and slowly claw back control of the media outlets and educational establishments so that maybe, just maybe, the 10 year olds of today can grow up in a West free from Leftist political brainwashing.

And where did that start? Which leaders are responsible for it? Go on. I dare you. Or can you not say their names? Blaming Obama for everything is absolutely laughable, laughable, because it is so utterly wrong (I am not, BTW, particularly a fan - he was OK).

As for the line in bold above, do you know why he is immediately branded that way? Because every single thing he says appears to embrace one of those angles of thought and then some. Seriously. Look back. Hell look at today's comments, whatever they are.

Finally, here's a thought. You complain about 'globalism' yet tell me, are you prepared to spend a fiver more per t-shirt, a grand or two more per car if British made and developed? Do you shop at local shops or do it all at supermarkets? Newsagents or Smiths? Will you pay more for your services and ensure a higher working wage for the average person? The problem with people who bang on about 'globalism' is that they are usually not willing to spend a penny more to support local goods!!!!
 
Isn't a direct link like the country the attacker was born in a little simplistic though?

If there are some countries in this world whose residents are mainly Muslamic Infidels, banning immigration from those countries will at the very least reduce the spread of the disease in the US. Which, in turn, should reduce the number of people willing to take extreme actions in the name of the paedo prophet.

I'd like to point out that I don't really agree with borders in that sense, and that I see immigration as a good thing. But if you are going to stop immigration, then religion (or at least, likely religion) is probably the best reason to do so.

No it won't.
That is a little simplistic.
In fact, bans of this nature are a massive, massive boost to those nutty tossers, doubtless swell their ranks and give them the perfect platform from which to shout that we hate them all and are the enemy!
 
Ever considered the possibility that Bannon is behind paid agitators? You know, so as people think it is , err, 'leftist fascism'? And before you start requesting I wear a tin-hat, look at the modern history of regime change in Central America and the Middle East...
Black Block anyone?
 
No it won't.

That is a little simplistic.
In fact, bans of this nature are a massive, massive boost to those nutty tossers, doubtless swell their ranks and give them the perfect platform from which to shout that we hate them all and are the enemy!
But those people aren't bombing Americans anyway so it shouldn't matter.
 
When there have been zero attacks from anyone on the Muslim Ban list it begs the question why ban people from these countries. The ban has been celebrated by ISIS as a recruiting tool. In my opinion there is nothing done by the Trump administration that is any good for people who have one iota of compassion and kindness in their bodies. If he can create conditions for a terrorist attack it will allow him to invoke emergency powers and ignore the courts and ride roughshod over our rights.
Because they're Muslims.

If we accept (and I think I've established it on various threads fairly clearly here) that Islam = bad, then reducing the number of people immigrating from countries that are majority Muslims will reduce the number of muslamic infidels in the US. Reduce the number, reduce the spread, reduce the chance of nutjobs. All the better for the US.
 
Because they're Muslims.

If we accept (and I think I've established it on various threads fairly clearly here) that Islam = bad, then reducing the number of people immigrating from countries that are majority Muslims will reduce the number of muslamic infidels in the US. Reduce the number, reduce the spread, reduce the chance of nutjobs. All the better for the US.


Using this warped logic, the US should also ban Catholics based on the bombings carried out by the IRA. Completely irrational on so many levels.
 
And where did that start? Which leaders are responsible for it? Go on. I dare you. Or can you not say their names? Blaming Obama for everything is absolutely laughable, laughable, because it is so utterly wrong (I am not, BTW, particularly a fan - he was OK).

As for the line in bold above, do you know why he is immediately branded that way? Because every single thing he says appears to embrace one of those angles of thought and then some. Seriously. Look back. Hell look at today's comments, whatever they are.

Finally, here's a thought. You complain about 'globalism' yet tell me, are you prepared to spend a fiver more per t-shirt, a grand or two more per car if British made and developed? Do you shop at local shops or do it all at supermarkets? Newsagents or Smiths? Will you pay more for your services and ensure a higher working wage for the average person? The problem with people who bang on about 'globalism' is that they are usually not willing to spend a penny more to support local goods!!!!


There is no limit to the irrational nut jobbery of the extreme right. I find it amusing.
 
Back