braineclipse
Steve Sedgley
Messi would not have survived, let alone thrived, in the conditions Maradona faced at his peak. Maradona's physique - thick, stout, low centre of gravity - and mentality borne out of a racism-based persecution complex, let him endure the more tolerated brutal, physical punishment of his era. As skillfully blessed as Messi is - superior to Maradona in many ways - he could never have endured the relentless punishment Maradona suffered and recovered from (see Andoni Goikoetxea, Butcher of Bilbao) to resume performing at a peak level. Messi just doesn't have the physique for that.
Perhaps, perhaps not. Messi has been on the receiving end of a lot of tackles, often just gotten back up again, rarely been injured.
It's unlikely that his career would have had the longevity if he played back then for sure. Maradona didn't either.
Also unknown is how Maradona would have dealt with the tougher aspects of the modern game. No doubt he would have dealt technically, but would he have been up for the work demanded to keep himself fit enough like modern footballers have to. His lifestyle been then combined with modern football wouldn't have worked out particularly well.
That's not to say he wouldn't have adapted. More just to reiterate why these comparisons over different times is very difficult.
Messi and Maradona, up there. Ranking the two is just speculation imo. Can be fun, but there's no real answer to be found.