• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Savinho

Status
Not open for further replies.
Daisuk said:
All the other blokes have been saying something like this in 327 different ways, but when it's 'orny Orny, then who knows? Hopefully we can pull it off! Getting them both would be absolute class!
Click to expand...

It’s only the 2nd time he has mentioned Savinho since July 2025.
 
There's some Brazilian media of uncertain reliability being discussed by City fans saying the Savinho package is now approaching 100m euros but Marmoush would be another 55m euros on top - which, if true, can only be to minimize a sell-on clause for Marmoush.
 
JerusalemMan said:
There's some Brazilian media of uncertain reliability being discussed by City fans saying the Savinho package is now approaching 100m euros but Marmoush would be another 55m euros on top - which, if true, can only be to minimize a sell-on clause for Marmoush.
Click to expand...

Makes sense.
 
It'll more palatable for some Spurs fans to think of ~£65m being paid for each of them.
But it'll absolutely infuriate some media/other fans to think of us getting another huge ~£85m deal through the door.
 
JerusalemMan said:
There's some Brazilian media of uncertain reliability being discussed by City fans saying the Savinho package is now approaching 100m euros but Marmoush would be another 55m euros on top - which, if true, can only be to minimize a sell-on clause for Marmoush.
Click to expand...
It also helps us with amortisation as Savinho's value will likely hold up (due to being 5 years younger), whilst Marmoush's has likely peaked
 
SissokoWasGood (BoL) said:
Surely there has to be some sort of regulation brought in to stop clubs avoiding sell on clauses in this way? Doesn’t seem right to me.
Click to expand...
You'd think something could be disputed around some 'fair market value' condition?....but if Marmoush is transferred at around what City paid for him...it would be hard to argue his price has been suppressed.
 
Ex journalist guy from the Mirror. Would explain the hold-up with Savinho and the price. Not sure City are allowed to do it this way, but surely it can't backfire on us? £65M ish for each guy, not too bad after some of the first numbers quoted.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
ricky2tricky4city said:
You'd think something could be disputed around some 'fair market value' condition?....but if Marmoush is transferred at around what City paid for him...it would be hard to argue his price has been suppressed.
Click to expand...

Yeah and I guess it’s very hard to prove anyway. Eg Savinho fee being that high but…younger? More potential? Who’s to say he isn’t worth it? Who’s to say we aren’t desperate for a winger and wouldn’t pay it?

Just seems ridiculous that you can have multiple journalists pumping out that it’s to avoid a sell on and yet City and us will get away with it scot free. Maybe all clubs do it and surely we’ve been effected by it too, so maybe it’s just the cost of doing business and when these opportunities arise, you take them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back