• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ITK Thread

Daisuk said:
He’s probably just making it up, but oh well.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1960645271580274904
Click to expand...
Had a look at KUMB to see what they are saying, they've started a relegation thread, trying to guess who will be the other two to be relegated with them!
Will absolutely light it up at a club with runners that he can pick out for fun. And a club with players that can do their job behind him and clean up the odd time that he loses the ball when trying to make something happen, GHod forbid.

There’s a reason he was lined up £80m for Pep and the champions.

Imagine that. Instead it’s Fullkrug, Prowse, Soucek, Guido…

Poor bloke and Bowen must be shell shocked.
Click to expand...
He is a good player and seems to prefer playing with the younger players who seem to be better on the ball and quicker.
He will look good when he moves to a club with better players around him.
Yes he can give the ball away and is not always the best at tracking back.
At times he can produce magic
Click to expand...
I really want Paqueta to stay and show us his best form but I would not blame him for jumping ship - just as long as he doesn't rock up at Spurs. That would be unforgiveable, not by our Brazilian magnifico, after all, he is a professional sportsman who will go wherever he is paid a salary, but by our owners it would be yet another despicable disregard of the clubs supporters. Selling 2 of our best three players to one of our bitterest rivals is c***ish behaviour.
Click to expand...
Pacca will be off though.
Click to expand...
 
Lilbaz said:
Why would we replace him?
Click to expand...

I am guessing that the club want to give Vuskovic the chance to develop further whilst Frank wants a ready-baked, full-experience LCB/FB to come in and hit the ground running. I think if we can get it done this is a deal which makes good sense for the 'now' personally.
 
thfcsteff said:
I am guessing that the club want to give Vuskovic the chance to develop further whilst Frank wants a ready-baked, full-experience LCB/FB to come in and hit the ground running. I think if we can get it done this is a deal which makes good sense for the 'now' personally.
Click to expand...

Would we have a squad place, unless we don't register Davies or Takai? I'd rather just stick with those I think than Ake on loan.
 
thfcsteff said:
I am guessing that the club want to give Vuskovic the chance to develop further whilst Frank wants a ready-baked, full-experience LCB/FB to come in and hit the ground running. I think if we can get it done this is a deal which makes good sense for the 'now' personally.
Click to expand...

It doesn't make any sense. Vuskovic won't take up a place in the pl squad. Ake will. Also can't go in the cl squad. So if we do bring in a 10 we have to sell a senior player.
We have danso, dragusin, romero, vdv, davies, takai who can play cb. It's the one area of the pitch we are stacked.

If ake came in he'd have to replace one of our over 21s cbs. Not vuskovic. We can loan vuskovic with no need to replace.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back