• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Financial Fair Play

I tell you now, this investigation will lead to nothing - at most it will result in a slap on the wrist in the form of a suspended transfer ban and a symbolic fine.
 
Oh ... so does that set the precedent now? Should we expect the FFP to go after City and Chelski next? If they don't, then that conviction against QPR is quite simply ridiculous.
 
Daisuk said:
Oh ... so does that set the precedent now? Should we expect the FFP to go after City and Chelski next? If they don't, then that conviction against QPR is quite simply ridiculous.
Click to expand...

I think these are regulations specific for the Championship or Football League. The PL also have some of their own. UEFA's only relate to teams that qualify for Europe.
 
Jordinho said:
I think these are regulations specific for the Championship or Football League. The PL also have some of their own. UEFA's only relate to teams that qualify for Europe.
Click to expand...

Ah, I see. Still though, something's obviously wrong somewhere, or someone simply aren't paying the right people the right amounts of cash.
 
How can they do that to QPR and PSG are apparently just fine? What b0ll0cks, just going after the small fry.
 
Bedfordspurs said:
Different FFP policy
Click to expand...

It's all flimflam though isn't it? Where is the "fair play" when it comes to PSG's finances? Bogus sponsorship deals or other such nonsense, they ain't buying Neymar and the like with money generated fairly by the club, but money pumped in one way or another by the owners. It's now reached a farcical level. Same goes for Emirates Marketing Project and formerly, Chelsea.

But clubs like QPR will get punished to the max for not obeying the letter of the law, even though it's clubs like PSG who are the very antithesis of financial fair play. No justice imo.

How can rules that govern championship teams be stricter than rules governing champions league teams? It's such nonsense.
 
the dza said:
It's all flimflam though isn't it? Where is the "fair play" when it comes to PSG's finances? Bogus sponsorship deals or other such nonsense, they ain't buying Neymar and the like with money generated fairly by the club, but money pumped in one way or another by the owners. It's now reached a farcical level. Same goes for Emirates Marketing Project and formerly, Chelsea.

But clubs like QPR will get punished to the max for not obeying the letter of the law, even though it's clubs like PSG who are the very antithesis of financial fair play. No justice imo.

How can rules that govern championship teams be stricter than rules governing champions league teams? It's such nonsense.
Click to expand...

Both are as guilty in spending money they don’t have, but PSG cook their books better

City are another that make me laugh. They advertise on the radio still for tickets available.... yet claim they sell out because they need the money
 
I don't get why people get so upset about FFP. The scheme has been put in place because the biggest clubs wanted and supported this. It is the perfect solution for the powerhouses of European football, ensuring that they will remain where they are, never being challenged by the annyoing noveau riche clubs. I don't see why club owners should not be free to take risks with or even waste their investments, as owners of any other type of business are free to do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back