• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Omar Marmoush

Yiddo said:
De Zerbi has to find a way of getting Marmoush in the central position behind the striker aswell as Maddison in the team. Marmoush will get us 10 league goals if he is playing in the correct position.
Click to expand...
Super easy way to do. Accept the reduced physical presence and play Marmoush as the 9 and with Maddison in behind feeding balls into the space for him to run on to. When we tried Marmoush solo up earlier in the season it was never with someone who could split the lines and give him a chance in space to get his shots off.
 
Bishop said:
Super easy way to do. Accept the reduced physical presence and play Marmoush as the 9 and with Maddison in behind feeding balls into the space for him to run on to. When we tried Marmoush solo up earlier in the season it was never with someone who could split the lines and give him a chance in space to get his shots off.
Click to expand...
Solanke doesn't even offer much of a physical presence, so it's not much of a step down.

let's assume next week is a write off, I'd like to see it tried v Palace
 
Need to see if he will be fit, or how long he will be out for after going off last night.

But Madison in behind Marmoush, Savio and Kudus sounds fun.
Even last night you could see players wanting to make a run in behind Coventry, and who ever had the ball wouldn't play it.

Or when we did the run wasn't timed, or we held the pass too long.
 
El Dante said:
Am I right in thinking we saw evidence of Guardiola’s coaching there? The way that Marmoush let the ball past him to then turn on to it and finish
Click to expand...
Just came in here to post that. Was a great show of awareness. Plus I’m amazed VAR for once didn’t disallow it for the “elbow”

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Bishop said:
Super easy way to do. Accept the reduced physical presence and play Marmoush as the 9 and with Maddison in behind feeding balls into the space for him to run on to. When we tried Marmoush solo up earlier in the season it was never with someone who could split the lines and give him a chance in space to get his shots off.
Click to expand...

Does this theoretically work with either Kulu or Simons as the 10, if not with Fernandes or Gallagher? Maddison is never going to be a permanent fixture in the lineup, sadly.
 
ShipOfGoldblum said:
Does this theoretically work with either Kulu or Simons as the 10, if not with Fernandes or Gallagher? Maddison is never going to be a permanent fixture in the lineup, sadly.
Click to expand...
I think it works with Kulu also and Simons, they are all primed to play into someone. If we can as I said accept that he's not a physical battering ram, the increase in actual goal threat and shooting intention is beneficial.

For me Fernandes should never really play 10 and whilst Gallagher isn't the most finesse of players technically he does actually understand playing balls into space even if that's not really his strength.
 
Bishop said:
I think it works with Kulu also and Simons, they are all primed to play into someone. If we can as I said accept that he's not a physical battering ram, the increase in actual goal threat and shooting intention is beneficial.

For me Fernandes should never really play 10 and whilst Gallagher isn't the most finesse of players technically he does actually understand playing balls into space even if that's not really his strength.
Click to expand...

Cool, will look forward to seeing it tried out. Definitely preferable to some hipster variant on 4-4-2 with Marmoush paired up with the striker we don't actually have.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back