• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Dejan Kulusevski

Wow! Massive if true. If he returns fully fit and at the same level as before the injury, that's like a new £60-70m signing.
Yep, maybe higher.

He’s a real difference maker. Strong, excellent technique and a good finisher. I’ve mentioned on here before I think his best position maybe centrally in a 9/10 hybrid role similar to Havertz.
 
Yep, maybe higher.

He’s a real difference maker. Strong, excellent technique and a good finisher. I’ve mentioned on here before I think his best position maybe centrally in a 9/10 hybrid role similar to Havertz.
2024/25 we were the Kuluveski team.

He's been gone for so long, many have forgotten how good he has become in that central berth and had usurped the role from Maddison.

Really good to hear that he's back.
 
2024/25 we were the Kuluveski team.

He's been gone for so long, many have forgotten how good he has become in that central berth and had usurped the role from Maddison.

Really good to hear that he's back.
Memory might be playing tricks on me, but didn't he play through the middle up top a few times and look good?

Grasping at non Solanke / Richi options
 
He did a decent job hold up and link play wise but he doesn't really offer the threat of a striker when he played there.
I think he could be effective in a CF role against a low block where his lack of pace wouldn’t be exposed. Good at playing with his back to goal and bringing others into the game, while also able to beat his man and use his physicality to get on the end of crosses.

Against a mid or high block he could play RW or #10, where he can press their defenders and also provide an outlet for when we are in possession.
 
Does this mean that he could start against Brentford? Would love him to start the season as our number 10. Would be like a new signing. Missed the guy a lot last season.
 
Does this mean that he could start against Brentford? Would love him to start the season as our number 10. Would be like a new signing. Missed the guy a lot last season.

I think that would be a strech. Different injury but Dragusin was back in training in October and did not start a game until February.
 
I think that would be a strech. Different injury but Dragusin was back in training in October and did not start a game until February.

But Kulusevski has been training for a while and now been integrated into first team training? Albeit whilst the rest of the squad are the other side of the World.
 
2024/25 we were the Kuluveski team.

He's been gone for so long, many have forgotten how good he has become in that central berth and had usurped the role from Maddison.

Really good to hear that he's back.

Maddison scored and assisted at a better rate as an AM in 24/25, do you mean 23/24?

As Rob shows above with the numbers it's good that he can contribute from different positions - i don't seem him as our best option for AM though
 
Last edited:
2024/25 we were the Kuluveski team.

He's been gone for so long, many have forgotten how good he has become in that central berth and had usurped the role from Maddison.

Really good to hear that he's back.

We've not seen Fernandes or Tonali. But Kulusevski is head and shoulders our best player when at the peak of his powers/fitness
 
Hard to imagine him being up and running properly until November/December after that long out. He may never get back to where he was.
 
Validated by the man himself.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Back