• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Roberto De Zerbi *OFFICIAL*

I agree. It's could be genius or a nightmare. For me, all I care about is him keeping us up... If he wants to leave after that, he earned the full contract value.

I do believe his football better suits our squad. We just need to delay the inevitable implosion that comes with RDZ and identify the next manager we want
Oh what it would be like to stick with a manager for at least 3yrs..... guess we will never know.
 
Oh what it would be like to stick with a manager for at least 3yrs..... guess we will never know.
You can’t just stick with any old manager, it has to be the right one, or at the very least not a brick one! It’s just as much about admitting you’ve made a fudge up and having the balls to rectify it sometimes.

Would you have stuck with Frank for 3 years? We’d have been in league one... Or Tudor?
 
Sky reporting that the Greenwood issue will be addressed by RDZ at his first press conference.

Also: “The THST don’t speak for all Spurs supporters…,” says Sky journalist. No s hit, Sherlock! 🤣
To be fair they only speak for about 5% of all Spurs supporters.
 
You can’t just stick with any old manager, it has to be the right one, or at the very least not a brick one! It’s just as much about admitting you’ve made a fudge up and having the balls to rectify it sometimes.

Would you have stuck with Frank for 3 years? We’d have been in league one... Or Tudor?
This is the thing. Dynasty managers are rare. A lot of clubs are successful because they bin the manager off at the first signs of things getting stale. And the real successful dynasty managers are the ones that not only identify the radical changes necessary to stay at the top, but get the backing from their club to do just that. Fergie at Man Utd the classic example. He probably built at least 3 completely different squads in his time there. He got rid of players like Stam, Van Nistelrooy and Beckham when you would be thinking "you're mad" but he probably saw "they've lost that 5-10% here, they are in the comfort zone".

My biggest sadness following Spurs is we had that. Poch identified that players like Alli, Eriksen etc were mentally burning out and needed selling/replacing.....we never backed him....
 
To quote the Million Dollar Man, everybody has a price, and if they wanted to do this move on De Zerbi earlier, I think they could have. I think the prospect of relegation getting more real clarified their thinking and made it so almost whatever it costs to get him will be worth it if he keeps us up, and it’s that clarifying logic they didn’t have 2 months ago.

I like the fact that they have made a strong, long term bet. It makes me feel much better about relegation if we know we have a good manager for the long term. And I don’t blame VV/JL as much as I do for the other dreadful decisions they have made on this. But equally, the buck stops with them. If they were committed long term to De Zerbi they could have made that case to him 2 months ago. I think that even at that point they thought relegation was unlikely, and now it’s shifted to likely. It just all feels a bit like they keep making the slightly wrong decision. At least with a 5 year contract and no relegation clause it means they are finally seizing back control.
The bit I don't get here is that there is a very real threat of relegation. I think everyone has to accept that.

We've just made de Zerbi the 3rd highest paid coach in the country. He's signed a 5 year deal with us. What happens if we go down? Are we going to continue to pay him that salary? If so, that's nuts and is a sign of how desperate we are. If not and he there is some sort of reduction clause, he isn't going to stick around at a level that's below where he could be working and for a salary that isn't his market value.

I'd love to know the ins and outs of this deal.
 
The bit I don't get here is that there is a very real threat of relegation. I think everyone has to accept that.

We've just made de Zerbi the 3rd highest paid coach in the country. He's signed a 5 year deal with us. What happens if we go down? Are we going to continue to pay him that salary? If so, that's nuts and is a sign of how desperate we are. If not and he there is some sort of reduction clause, he isn't going to stick around at a level that's below where he could be working and for a salary that isn't his market value.

I'd love to know the ins and outs of this deal.
As it is one individual it probably isn't a financial game changer even in the championship....
 
This is the thing. Dynasty managers are rare. A lot of clubs are successful because they bin the manager off at the first signs of things getting stale. And the real successful dynasty managers are the ones that not only identify the radical changes necessary to stay at the top, but get the backing from their club to do just that. Fergie at Man Utd the classic example. He probably built at least 3 completely different squads in his time there. He got rid of players like Stam, Van Nistelrooy and Beckham when you would be thinking "you're mad" but he probably saw "they've lost that 5-10% here, they are in the comfort zone".

My biggest sadness following Spurs is we had that. Poch identified that players like Alli, Eriksen etc were mentally burning out and needed selling/replacing.....we never backed him....

Agreed. This «we should keep a manager for more than two years at all costs» trope is nonsensical. Having a manager hired for more than two years don’t make them any better. If you have someone good that may not hit the highs straight away, there’s an argument to be had for letting them get time, but in the case of say Frank and Ange, it would’ve been a disaster to keep either of them on (although Ange had technically deserved to be given a few more months).
 
As it is one individual it probably isn't a financial game changer even in the championship....
Reportedly, we’re playing him £12m a year. The average salary in The Championship is about £1.5m. That’d be insane when we’ll have lost £250m in revenue, be laying people off and may end up under FFP pressure.

I’m not knocking the appointment of de Zerbi. I think he’ll keep us up. But from the perspective of how this has been managed and handled, it seems absolutely mad.
 
The bit I don't get here is that there is a very real threat of relegation. I think everyone has to accept that.

We've just made de Zerbi the 3rd highest paid coach in the country. He's signed a 5 year deal with us. What happens if we go down? Are we going to continue to pay him that salary? If so, that's nuts and is a sign of how desperate we are. If not and he there is some sort of reduction clause, he isn't going to stick around at a level that's below where he could be working and for a salary that isn't his market value.

I'd love to know the ins and outs of this deal.

I’m assuming we’re going to keep paying him it, and it is part of a well thought through, long term plan to invest in the guy that we want to be our manager for a long time. And it was a way to lock him in. He won’t get a bigger club than ours offering this amount of money for this long a time frame. So it buys us the optionality of even if we do go down, we have a good manager embedding his principles and giving us the best chance of going straight back up, and a season in tier 2 being an aberration we recover quickly from. We can then be a newly promoted side but from a position of strength.

If it’s not that, and we’re genuinely over a barrel with respect to giving him a huge pay out even if he’s not successful with us and if he can walk in the summer anyway…well I’ll be annoyed but I won’t actually be surprised.

But like a total sucker I’m assuming there’s some well thought through logic from the team that brought us ‘we ran a comprehensive process - at pace - and Thomas Frank was the clear stand out.’
 
Agreed. This «we should keep a manager for more than two years at all costs» trope is nonsensical. Having a manager hired for more than two years don’t make them any better. If you have someone good that may not hit the highs straight away, there’s an argument to be had for letting them get time, but in the case of say Frank and Ange, it would’ve been a disaster to keep either of them on (although Ange had technically deserved to be given a few more months).
Yeah and it really is about getting the sporting director and overall scouting, analytics and medical set up good. That is what brings real stability to a club. One of the reasons we are such a mess is we appointed Paratici who if you read up on it favoured a more defensive coach that plays 3-4-3. We then lurched backwards and forwards from that position and Levy/board's preference for more attacking and managers that played different formations:
- Mourinho (4-5-1 counter attacking)
- Nuno (3-4-3 counter attacking)
-Conte (3-4-3 counter attacking)
- Ange (4-3-3 high press attacking inverted FB)
-Frank (4-5-1 counter attacking)
Just all over the place!
 
I’m assuming we’re going to keep paying him it, and it is part of a well thought through, long term plan to invest in the guy that we want to be our manager for a long time. And it was a way to lock him in. He won’t get a bigger club than ours offering this amount of money for this long a time frame. So it buys us the optionality of even if we do go down, we have a good manager embedding his principles and giving us the best chance of going straight back up, and a season in tier 2 being an aberration we recover quickly from. We can then be a newly promoted side but from a position of strength.

If it’s not that, and we’re genuinely over a barrel with respect to giving him a huge pay out even if he’s not successful with us and if he can walk in the summer anyway…well I’ll be annoyed but I won’t actually be surprised.

But like a total sucker I’m assuming there’s some well thought through logic from the team that brought us ‘we ran a comprehensive process - at pace - and Thomas Frank was the clear stand out.’
I hope you’re right because if we go down, that’s the best case scenario and we’ll still be paying almost ten times as much as the average manager wage in that league.

However, de Zerbi is combustible and he doesn’t stay places for long. He’d seem a very odd choice on paper to be the one to stick with us through thick and thin for 5 years. Good decisions are seldom made from a state of desperation and we’re desperate. This has all the hallmarks to me of a massive gamble that he will keep us up. If he doesn’t, I think Vinai and Lange have just thrown petrol on the inferno.
 
Asked a BHA season-ticket holder mate about RDZ…

“ he came in, rode on the coattails of Potter’s achievements, and made us one of the most entertaining teams in the world to watch. That first season when we finished sixth and qualified for the Europa league was probably the greatest season as a Brighton fan but that was Potter’s team and he joined us when we were second in the league with 15 points from 18. The second season it was obvious that something had changed and we/he didn’t cope with a small squad, multiple injuries and the extra games of Europe. We were terrible for the second half of the season. I don’t know if other teams worked him out or if his tactics were a bit one trick. A bit like Ange eh! He could be amazing expose, he could walk away when things get tough. Whatever happens you’ll be in for some amazing entertainment!”
I'm in the area and most the Brighton fans I know love him

He had key players sold (parting the model) and they were not really replaced.

Which lead to him melting down, given we are going to have a small transfer budget unless the owners invest, this could
Be over in the summer 🤣
 
Strangely, this appointment gives me some hope. I think we'll stick with him whatever happens. We need to rebuild. We need stability. We need a coach who plays the right kind of football.

Let's stop all the conjecture, whinging, even worrying about the drop, and just get back to enjoying football. Does it affect your bank ballance if we go down? Might save you money. It might bruise our egos, but it would be a new experience and maybe cleansing.

Most important is we get a good football manager in, and just stick with it now. Let them fail if they have to, make mistakes, learn and develop.
 
I'm in the area and most the Brighton fans I know love him

He had key players sold (parting the model) and they were not really replaced.

Which lead to him melting down, given we are going to have a small transfer budget unless the owners invest, this could
Be over in the summer 🤣
Yep. They are generally very positive on his time there.

Outside of the Greenwood issue, I don’t see any footballing reasons to not be excited about his appointment.
 
Back