Contingency planning : When Ange is sacked, who should replace him?

[fernadez]

How are they unrelated? Ange was consistently mocked because he hadn’t managed in the Premier League. Is that the only thing that matters? Feels like there might be more to it than you’re letting on.

Anyway. If you didn’t like the manager who won us a European trophy, I look forward to seeing how you measure this one.

I didn't say I agreed with the viewpoint.

It's unrelated because what Frank has or has not done in Europe bears no relation to what he has done in the league or is capable of doing in Europe.

Ange had done nothing in Europe before this season either.

You asked for an explanation of the 'logic of Ange not being good enough on account of his achievements coming in lesser leagues, but Thomas Frank who has literally not even managed a match Europe is the right man?'

The logic is that Ange had never managed in the league so that his prior experience might not be relevant to this league.

Then you put in about Frank managing in Europe, that's got nothing to do with his suitablilty to manage in the league, and as I've said, if that should be a consideration then it would have applied to Ange as well as his record in Europe was brick.

I, like Ange measure my managers on how they do in their day to day job of managing in the league. As he said himself, it's a better barometer of the long term process and chances of winning consistently.

 

[tommysvr]

I didn't say I agreed with the viewpoint.

It's unrelated because what Frank has or has not done in Europe bears no relation to what he has done in the league or is capable of doing in Europe.

Ange had done nothing in Europe before this season either.

You asked for an explanation of the 'logic of Ange not being good enough on account of his achievements coming in lesser leagues, but Thomas Frank who has literally not even managed a match Europe is the right man?'

The logic is that Ange had never managed in the league so that his prior experience might not be relevant to this league.

Then you put in about Frank managing in Europe, that's got nothing to do with his suitablilty to manage in the league, and as I've said, if that should be a consideration then it would have applied to Ange as well as his record in Europe was brick.

I, like Ange measure my managers on how they do in their day to day job of managing in the league. As he said himself, it's a better barometer of the long term process and chances of winning consistently.

I’m sorry you missed the point of my question.

 

[fernadez]

I’m sorry you missed the point of my question.

I forgive you.

Interesting that you didn't state I had missed the point the first time, but replied to my comment asking for further discourse. I'm not sure how you expected me to reply to you correctly without you explaining the point you were raising?

 

[Lilbaz]

That's what the headline says, but not the quotes. Well im here today is pretty vague about tomorrow

"Today it's not realistic. Look at where I am, where we are, and I think is the answer is so clear."

 

[afsoc4life]

Maybe this is because Conte knows that at some clubs it is not worth being successful in Europe if you crash and burn in the league.

Including Inter and Juventus? 2 giants in Italy and he couldnt even get to a final if i recall correctly.

 

[Daisuk]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1931685313279049841

 

[Lemonade Money]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1931685313279049841

Did he kiss the badge?