• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Financial Fair Play

Is anyone really surprised?

Methinks officials at organisations such Uooeffa and The Court of Arbitration for Sport are corrupted by the $$$$ and the Abudabishakey bepimpin hospitality hoe piccies...

Work that one out you clever things...:cool:
 
city are no different from chelsea.
we have to suck it up and move on!
And remember it tinkles off United and Liverpool :D
 
nelto said:
I have a dream that this could be the time that allows Uncle Joe to slice off about 1.5 billion from his fortune, pay off the Stadium and give Jose what he needs to completely rebuild the squad.

Then I'll wake up and have my cornflakes.
Click to expand...
He wouldn't tinkle on us if we were on fire
 
nelto said:
I have a dream that this could be the time that allows Uncle Joe to slice off about 1.5 billion from his fortune, pay off the Stadium and give Jose what he needs to completely rebuild the squad.

Then I'll wake up and have my cornflakes.
Click to expand...

I doubt “uncle Joe” has much of his rumoured $1.5b sitting around in liquidity. Most will be already committed, in the short term, in lone guarantees and other such financial agreements.
 
Last edited:
Not sure why the court adjudged them to be innocent, the direct evidence was there, and the circumstantial evidence of financial 'doping' was there for all to see. The football authorities have made a mockery of themselves and financial fair play.
 
SpurMeUp said:
Not sure why the court adjudged them to be innocent, the direct evidence was there, and the circumstantial evidence of financial 'doping' was there for all to see. The football authorities have made a mockery of themselves and financial fair play.
Click to expand...

According to 5Live’s analysis of it this evening it’s to do with UEFA not understanding its own rules.
 
A date cut-off isn't too complicated to understand. They used that to let off PSG, who have gone on to spend ridiculous amounts on transfers. I think UEFA exposed the weakness of their case by picking City over PSG and not going for both.
 
jts1882 said:
A date cut-off isn't too complicated to understand. They used that to let off PSG, who have gone on to spend ridiculous amounts on transfers. I think UEFA exposed the weakness of their case by picking City over PSG and not going for both.
Click to expand...
I thought they went for City because they got butthurt when those emails were released of City taking the tinkle
 
Away fans could boycott City. Would be symbolic only. But would send a powerful message that people don't like clubs like city taking the pizz.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back