No one knows how much of that 24m jump is bonuses.
It seems ridiculous trying to get in the competition if the money is instantly fudged down the drain in player bonuses.
It won't just be one off bonuses. They'll be clauses that players get a pay rise if we finish in x position or qualify for the Champion's League etc. So their basic would have risen also.
What proof there is this was actually the case?
Not saying we didn't pay bonuses but all of the increase (close to 25 million - and as far as 40m from another source) going to that?
I strongly doubt someone was stringent as Levy would make such questionable financial commitments to players based on our very first CL qualification, without having prior precedent how it would affect our books in the long run, etc. - similar to a chav winning some pessos from the lotto and buying a falt-screen TV and some new traines - ridiculous financial planning.
a list of permanent signings made since Redknapp took over :
Scott Parker, Louis Saha, Brad Friedel, Ryan Nelsen
Van der Vaart, Sandro, Pienaar, Gallas
Crouch, Bassong, Kaboul, Kyle Walker, Naughton, Krancjar, Jimmy Walker, Gudjonson
Keane, Defoe, Palacios, Corluka, Chimbonda, Cudicini
what can we read in to Redknapps transfer strategy from those 22 players ?
firstly i would give him credit for signing dependable players to balance a lop sided yet talented squad of players when it was needed after his arrival. but since then ?
there has been little focus on youth, only 3 players (Walker,Naughton & Sandro) are what id consider as players signed with a view to the future, there is a clear preference to signing older players who command big wages as back up options and he seems to rely solely on players with experience of the premier league.
so far, based on his activity in the transfer market, i would say he doesn't plan beyond the next season or two and relies too much on quick fix solutions. id say that possibly he is limited in respects to spotting emerging talent from abroad and also adding in to the mix his indecisiveness over the Suarez and Hunterlaar deals he is lacking confidence at buying 'top' players for this caliber of team
he has done well here no doubt - but i have grave concerns that IF the talent which was here when he arrived was to be sold on - would he be able to replace them adequately ?
do you have faith that he could replace the 'Top' players in our side ? If so what do you base that on ?
do you think he is bringing in enough young talent for the years to come ?
So according to this logic - it should go down this year since we failed to qualify for the CL last season (the one we finished 5th).
Fixed.
Honestly, can we all just agree on one thing? The man is going to deliver a cavalcade of flimflam that many will eat up with delight as the silver-tongued cavalier rewrites history and patronizes people who saw things with their own two eyes all at once? In fact he will, whether he's here or not, deliver words which will convince me he is football's version of David Blaine i.e. the smoothest, creates of escape artists who somehow leaves every situation with his own reputation untouched.
Harry is to honesty and integrity what Helen Keller is to basketball.
I doubt there is a clause that reducing wages, beyond being relegated.
I don't find it questionable. It's a lot more sensible to have performance related contracts. If the club does well, the players are rewarded. It's far riskier having players on high, flat wages, as many clubs find out when they're relegated. This is probably something we've put in contracts for years now, knowing a certain percentage of the win money would go straight to the players. The bonuses would depend on how much we made, not be a fixed sum. There's no way we would suddenly increase our wage budget without knowing how much we were going to make, what if we had failed in the playoff?
Are these random Chelsea fans he's shaking hands with?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.