parklane1
Tony Galvin
How many has he scored in Spain and Italy dumbass?
You still have not taken that water have you, with a vocabulary like yours i will have to resort to chav speak :ross:
How many has he scored in Spain and Italy dumbass?
You still have not taken that water have you, with a vocabulary like yours i will have to resort to chav speak :ross:
Huntelaar would have been worth a gamble. Ok, there's a chance he wouldn't have performed, but if we have the money available why not take a chance on him, rather than go for Saha, who we knew would score a few but basically be injured and uninfluential for the majority of the time? Fortune favours the brave.
Exactly. He's scored fudge all in any decent league.
Go and educate yourself before you open your trap again.
Huntelaar would have been worth a gamble. Ok, there's a chance he wouldn't have performed, but if we have the money available why not take a chance on him, rather than go for Saha, who we knew would score a few but basically be injured and un-influential for the majority of the time? Fortune favours the brave.
Huntelaar would have been worth a gamble. Ok, there's a chance he wouldn't have performed, but if we have the money available why not take a chance on him, rather than go for Saha, who we knew would score a few but basically be injured and un-influential for the majority of the time? Fortune favours the brave.
So go on,please educate us masses and let us know if you think the German Lge is not a decent one.
Huntelaar was available for around 10 mill before Schalke signed him. Redknapp schose to sign Crouch instead
What? Gamble ?ú30m? Are you out of your fudging mind?
I don't get this nonsense that we should spend money, regardless of the talent. That's just ridiculous. Huntelaar isn't worth ?ú30m - period. 'Taking a gamble' is punting a few million on someone like Saha. Risking your entire striker budget on Huntelaar is putting the whole bloody house on it. That's not a way to run a football club.
Wait till the summer. We can't change what's gone before, so wait till the summer. Let's see who becomes available, and let's see what ?ú30m can buy you, because - in that market - Huntelaar becomes a ?ú15m striker AT BEST. No fudging need to go wasting funds - we're not Emirates Marketing Project; we don't have some endless supply of it.
but over a long season you have to wonder about the stamina of elder players like Brad and Scotty, and about the commitment of on loan Adebayor
Crouch indeed did a job. Fcuking 'ell
You're talking rubbish about Brad and Scotty. Brad has been excellent for us with no fitness worries whatsoever, and Scotty has been a stalwart in our midfield. Fitness and stamina wise, he has surpassed the likes of VdV, Sandro, Lennon etc... in midfield this season
Not my problem if your memory lasts no further than the last couple of games.
Perhaps it speaks volumes, that Crouch was sold for more money than we paid for him. I mean, that just screams failure doesn't it?
You are making brick up again, when we were intrested in him and before Redknapp decided he did not want him the price was 12 million not thirty. Still never let the facts get in the way of your flimflam.
nothing wrong with my memory mate, i just wondered what kind of a job Crouch did that another half decent striker couldnt have done.
Plus it was depressing watching us launch hoofballs to him time after time
Peter Crouch hey...wowser
Im sure Redknapp will use that one, that he bought Peter Crouch for 10 million, and then sold him to Stoke for 10 million rising to 12 million if he scores 100 goals
blinding bit of business 'Arry. A % of the transfer 'Arry?