• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

The transfer thread

I think it's too early to make a call on Gokyeres, Portuguese football is not that strong and the 3 goals against a struggling City has helped to hype him up.
I've only seen him play twice, both for Sweden, and was very impressed. He linked up with Isak and Deki so well. He plays a bit like Deki, but better, and with far more goal threat.
 
I've only seen him play twice, both for Sweden, and was very impressed. He linked up with Isak and Deki so well. He plays a bit like Deki, but better, and with far more goal threat.

Sweden are in a weak group like England, looking at his record with club and country he does well against poorer teams. He's young enough but the money will be too high for someone who's only played at a low level league.
 
I'm kinda glad we didn't get Muani. Feels like a very expensive player on huge wages that would expect to start most games... but doesn't have a truly elite skill set to warrant that. He does look "good" but if he was that good, why has nobody talked about him for years, other than his miss in the WC Final?

I know Spurs are scouting thousands of players at all times, and would rather we find a 23 year old star that is about to burst onto the world stage, already with 150 senior games, just like we found Kinski at Slavia.

Edit - if it was a true star like Osimhen or Gokyeres or whatever then absolutely yes, but I think we can still find gems somewhere in the world, for low fees and wages and keep the team spirit all together.
I'm OK with it. I think he has some of that "elite" level quality. But unsure about his suitability to playing for us and against a low block (one of our biggest issues). Seems a more transitional player to me.

We seemingly tried, he chose Juve, it happens. Only half way through January, hopefully we have other good targets to pursue.
 
I think it's too early to make a call on Gokyeres, Portuguese football is not that strong and the 3 goals against a struggling City has helped to hype him up.


??? Guy is 25, with 75 goals in 80 games for Sporting, 15 goals in 26 for Sweden

Last 4 seasons are (so starting at 21), 18, 22, 43 and this season 32 in 30

Nothing to with City game mate, someone is going to take a punt on him this summer.
 
Sweden are in a weak group like England, looking at his record with club and country he does well against poorer teams. He's young enough but the money will be too high for someone who's only played at a low level league.

On the basis of only scoring against poorer teams you wouldn't have had Kane at his PL peak then?
ALL strikers score against weaker teams, rarely do you see the top teams let in 5 or 6.
 
Think that's us done for the window now. I cant see any other RWFs on the market, and we seem to be leaving LB till the summer (when Mitchell is free?)
The pattern is quite clear that there typically aren't a lot of rumours for players we're trying to sign until they're fairly close to completion.

Not saying we didn't try for Muani, quite a lot of credible links and even though we try to keep things quiet that won't always be possible.

My point though is that we have no way of knowing what's happening next. We're only half way through January, already signed one player who looks really good this window (plus Yang who was already done earlier on). Ange has been pretty clear that he wants reinforcements, I don't think he would say those things if he didn't think it was likely that we'd get someone in.

I think the wide attacker market is pretty good. Even another Odobert type signing could be very useful imo.
 
??? Guy is 25, with 75 goals in 80 games for Sporting, 15 goals in 26 for Sweden

Last 4 seasons are (so starting at 21), 18, 22, 43 and this season 32 in 30

Nothing to with City game mate, someone is going to take a punt on him this summer.

They may but like all transfers it's a "punt" and too expensive for us.
On the basis of only scoring against poorer teams you wouldn't have had Kane at his PL peak then?
ALL strikers score against weaker teams, rarely do you see the top teams let in 5 or 6.

We didn't have to pay for Kane, there are far more weak teams in Portugal than PL. I think probably only Woolwich and Chelsea would pay the sort of money they would want.
 
I'm kinda glad we didn't get Muani. Feels like a very expensive player on huge wages that would expect to start most games... but doesn't have a truly elite skill set to warrant that. He does look "good" but if he was that good, why has nobody talked about him for years, other than his miss in the WC Final?

I know Spurs are scouting thousands of players at all times, and would rather we find a 23 year old star that is about to burst onto the world stage, already with 150 senior games, just like we found Kinski at Slavia.

Edit - if it was a true star like Osimhen or Gokyeres or whatever then absolutely yes, but I think we can still find gems somewhere in the world, for low fees and wages and keep the team spirit all together.
Both are very much strikers though and Solanke is fine. He's not a weak point in the team or squad whereas the right hand side definitely is. Muani is primarily a rwf who could cover striker as well, neither of the guys you mentioned play the same role. So we are looking for a RWF with versatility it seems rather than a an outright no9 which the guys you mentioned are.
 
So we stick with what we have
Any deal we were rumoured to be looking at had a buy clause
We may or may not have stepped back and Juve don’t have that clause to deal with

I wonder if his rumoured 200k wages figured into any decision? Perhaps the thought was we'd sign him and pay those wages but offload Werner and his wages. Perhaps Werner's injury scuppered it?
 
We didn't have to pay for Kane, there are far more weak teams in Portugal than PL. I think probably only Woolwich and Chelsea would pay the sort of money they would want.

The point was, on the basis of "only scoring against weaker teams" you would rule out 90% of players, including Kane if you had to buy him, seeing as weaker teams are more likely to concede goals than top teams are.
You can't select players on a single point of reference but on their overall game.
 
That really hasn't been the script recently, even in January. I guess Werner could fit in that category, but certainly Porro, Bentancur, Kulusevski and Dragusin don't. Neither does Kinsky.

Its more just that we move for our good long term targets early in the window, then panic buy the cheap crap at the end.
 
Both are very much strikers though and Solanke is fine. He's not a weak point in the team or squad whereas the right hand side definitely is. Muani is primarily a rwf who could cover striker as well, neither of the guys you mentioned play the same role. So we are looking for a RWF with versatility it seems rather than a an outright no9 which the guys you mentioned are.
If we "have to" sign a versatile player that can play both RWF and striker for sure that limits our options severely. And probably Muani was one of the best of rather few options that could do that.

Will be interesting to see what we do. I hope we don't value versatility too highly if that makes sense.
 
The point was, on the basis of "only scoring against weaker teams" you would rule out 90% of players, including Kane if you had to buy him, seeing as weaker teams are more likely to concede goals than top teams are.
You can't select players on a single point of reference but on their overall game.

Like Soldado?
 
Back