• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

The Official 2014/15 Premier League Thread

Hold on, I've just seen the table, if we win tomorrow at home were 2 points behind west ham! This is them in great form and us in poor form!
 
let this small club enjoy their win.. itll be even funnier when the bubbles burst

Mate, I dislike them as much as you, but give some credit when it's due. They defended brilliantly for the last 30 minutes, city pushed the whole time but couldn't do what they did to us.

Fair play to west ham , still pikeys but did well
 
Well done West Ham!

Shame as City are probably the most likely way that Chelsea will be stopped from winning the league and just as likely they'll be beyond our reach come the end of the season. But always fun with an upset.
 
Mate, I dislike them as much as you, but give some credit when it's due. They defended brilliantly for the last 30 minutes, city pushed the whole time but couldn't do what they did to us.

Fair play to west ham , still pikeys but did well

they did well.. its a shame we didnt put 9 men behind the ball when we were... losing 2-1 i suppose.
 
Mate, I dislike them as much as you, but give some credit when it's due. They defended brilliantly for the last 30 minutes, city pushed the whole time but couldn't do what they did to us.

Fair play to west ham , still pikeys but did well

It makes me laugh - had we beat Man ****ty - this board would be euphoric, but because its the Spammers, all of a sudden we dismiss the win. I agree with you in that credit shoul dbe given to them and Sam who seems to have turned them around. Whilst I didnt watch the game from reading reports it seems Man ****ty dominated large chunks of the game but the Spammers defence stood strong - unlike ours which wilts almost instantly.

Its denial again, ooh it wont last etc etc etc. I remember a few seasons back when **** were winning with RVP and it was the same 'oh it wont last' or 'oh RVP will get injured' well ****in hell hmmmmmmmmm.
 
It makes me laugh - had we beat Man ****ty - this board would be euphoric, but because its the Spammers, all of a sudden we dismiss the win. I agree with you in that credit shoul dbe given to them and Sam who seems to have turned them around. Whilst I didnt watch the game from reading reports it seems Man ****ty dominated large chunks of the game but the Spammers defence stood strong - unlike ours which wilts almost instantly.

Its denial again, ooh it wont last etc etc etc. I remember a few seasons back when **** were winning with RVP and it was the same 'oh it wont last' or 'oh RVP will get injured' well ****in hell hmmmmmmmmm.

Where do you think West Ham will finish this season then?
 
B0y_t8FIAAIQuXx.jpg
 
fat sam's stopped playing long ball, bought couple of good attacking players, spammers solid top 10 side now
 
It makes me laugh - had we beat Man ****ty - this board would be euphoric, but because its the Spammers, all of a sudden we dismiss the win. I agree with you in that credit shoul dbe given to them and Sam who seems to have turned them around. Whilst I didnt watch the game from reading reports it seems Man ****ty dominated large chunks of the game but the Spammers defence stood strong - unlike ours which wilts almost instantly.

Its denial again, ooh it wont last etc etc etc. I remember a few seasons back when **** were winning with RVP and it was the same 'oh it wont last' or 'oh RVP will get injured' well ****in hell hmmmmmmmmm.

we wouldnt look **** if we had 9 men behind the ball.. look at the Arsenal game, we were LAUDED for our defensive performance but its not the Spurs way, we could have uite easily done this against City but instead we took the game to them. Unfortunately we didn't get a tired City team and we didn't manage to go ahead so we don't know if we'd have done the West Ham tactics, maybe if Mason had not missed a sitter we'd have found out.

a shame really.
 
If Chelsea could get the win at OT tomorrow they would have an 8 point lead on City, which is huge after only 9 games. City fans had better hope for a United win.
 
It makes me laugh - had we beat Man ****ty - this board would be euphoric, but because its the Spammers, all of a sudden we dismiss the win. I agree with you in that credit shoul dbe given to them and Sam who seems to have turned them around. Whilst I didnt watch the game from reading reports it seems Man ****ty dominated large chunks of the game but the Spammers defence stood strong - unlike ours which wilts almost instantly.

Its denial again, ooh it wont last etc etc etc. I remember a few seasons back when **** were winning with RVP and it was the same 'oh it wont last' or 'oh RVP will get injured' well ****in hell hmmmmmmmmm.

Oh please! Where are west ham finishing then this Season? The reality check is being put on west ham the last couple of pages because someone suggested they'll finish above us. No-ones saying Spurs are gonna be top four or even top five just that west ham will do well to finish above us as that would mean a champs league push or even place!

What exactly are you laughing at? I find it laughable that after 9 games when they've only played Liverpool and city both at home, that they're suddenly champs league contenders or something! It's classic knee jerking after a few good early results. The same was said about Southampton on here last season at this stage as well.
 
Last edited:
Wes Brown -- pretty solid right-back, absolutely f**king useless centre-half. A joke that he has made a career in that position, what a useless f**king waste of oxygen he is.
 
And West Ham are a decent side. They should have beaten us, they smashed Liverpool and got a deserved win v City. They are also playing some half-decent football.
 
Back