SUIYHA
Scott Parker
1) Liverpool were expected to challenge for the league the year they finished 7th? i don't think so. He could quite easily get 60m to spend on player sales alone...i'm sure he could do a lot with that.
2) I don't know if he fell out with anyone at Valencia but it's common knowledge Moratti is a ****.
3) You're just stating opinion rather than anything factual here.
4) This is simply untrue beyond belief. Were you an AVB fan btw?
5) A total myth that his teams play boring football.
6) I've explained this before...the Alonso thing made PERFECT sense at the time. He wanted a pure defensive midfielder in the starting 11 to free up Gerrard in a more attacking role in the final third. At the time Alonso was deep lying playmaker that had not showcased his defensive skills to the degree that Gareth Barry did. Of course now it's obvious Alonso can play that role but at the time he didn't trust him enough to give him as much defensive responsibility as he would Barry had he signed. Of those list of strikers....Crouch and Kuyt did well...Bellamy did a decent job and Cisse was ok. I don't get what that list is meant to prove.
7) Maybe...not sure tbh. Would have to research this further.
8) So?
I really don't think you remember Rafa's reign at Liverpool too well.
1. They most certainly were expected to challenge that year:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/legacy/philmcnulty/2009/08/chelsea_and_manchester_united.html
http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2009/aug/06/premier-league-preview-liverpool
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/ar...es-Liverpool-title-Old-Grumpy-moan-about.html
They'd just finished 2nd and the team that finished above them had just sold Ronaldo and Tevez. They'd dropped a fair few points when Gerrard and Torres had been injured the year before, so the logic was if they stayed fit, the title was surely theirs. The more tactically astute amongst us realised that without Alonso, and with Gerrard playing behind the striker, there was nobody in midfield who could pass the ball and they were ****ed. Especially after a BAE inspired Spurs win on the first day of the season \o/
£60m to spend? Honestly, he'd probably sign one really good player, three average players and three players who are an embarrassment to the shirt.
2. Yes, he fell out with the board at Valencia too. I have no idea what his working relationship with Abramovic was like (probably not good). Even if we put Chelsea aside, as nobody really knows what goes on in there, that's three successive clubs he's fallen out with the owners at. Do you think Levy and Baldini are just really nice chaps that won't have anything bad to say to him if results aren't going out way?
3. Think there's a lot of fact in there. Real and Barca had dreadful seasons the years that Valencia won the league (though Real did win the CL in one of them). Poor league form IS an issue. He stayed at Liverpool for as long as he did because they were consistently good in Europe, but his league form raised questions about him getting sacked every year. Had Gerrard been booked for diving instead of having a penalty awarded in the CL final, the poor league form would most likely have cost Benitez his job in 2007 or 2008, as Liverpool were supposed to be one of the "Big Four" but never even came close to challenging for the title in five of his six seasons there. Same with his time at Inter, same with Chelsea.
4. I wasn't an AVB fan. I don't think there's anything wrong with relying on a star player or two, if you're sure they're going to be available. Again, I don't think you remember all this too well, as Liverpool were regularly called a "two man team" because they dropped points so often when either Gerrard or Torres wasn't available. Replicate this to our situation, in a more competitive league now where we are the 6th best of seven teams going for four Champions League spots, compared with when Liverpool were one of only four teams with a realistic chance of finishing in the top 4. If we don't quite make it and Eriksen/Lamela asks to leave for Champions League football again, we'll find ourselves in the same situation as this season, with the team miles off the pace and Benitez coming out saying how he could have won the World Cup if only we'd kept our star player...
5. It's not a myth. I watched his Liverpool and Chelsea sides regularly for years. I've acknowledged that they had some great games where the football was exceptional, but most of the time the great games were moments of individual brilliance. The FA Cup final against West Ham for example, Liverpool were crap, but Gerrard scored a screamer to cap off one of the most entertaining cup finals ever. For every game like that, there's a 0-0 boreathon. Those games with Mourinho....christ I can't even think about watching one of those again.
6. I guess Mascherano wasn't defensive enough for him then? He should also have known what Alonso was capable of, he only worked with him in training and on the pitch for 5 years. The list was meant to prove that, in six years of looking for star players, the kind to lift Liverpool from being a team that just qualifies for the Champions League every year because Tottenham can't get their act together properly to stop them, to being the kind that challenges for the title. Crouch, Kuyt, Bellamy, Cisse, Keane....can you imagine Man Utd, Arsenal or Chelsea spending big money to sign players like these to play up front around that time? They'd be squad players at best. Benitez signed them to be first teamers. Arsenal had Van Persie, Man Utd had Rooney, Chelsea had Drogba, and Liverpool had Peter Crouch. Let's not get started on the wingers, as Benayoun aside, they were beyond awful.
8. It's not a make or break point. But I prefer to limit the number of people I've spent years hating that I have to learn to love. Adebayor and Gallas were ok as the Arsenal fans hate them too. I'd also prefer our manager to have a bit of class and decorum about them, eg - Ancelotti, than be a complete tool.