Re: **Official Other Games Thread, Season 2012/13**
Oh the ironing - I won't even bother looking for some of your quotes towards me from a few weeks back. Real mature grown-up debate.
Another pathetic insult from the mature debater that is yourself -well done big man - you win the internet.
Is your stance to accept different opinions? Strange - all you ever seem to do in these kind of threads is either copy/paste some info from the skyscraper forums or state as fact what we can and cannot do financially - in addition to refuting anyone who dares to post something against DL. Calling you up on some these is not discrediting you - that would be the equivalent of saying you're taking gonads or similar insults (see above) - don't recall such occurence taking place. In addition you seem to take offence to anyone refusing to acknowledge your 'points'. It is clear as daylight you mainly seem to populate the Levy threads these days - so for anyone to suggest you might have a point to make is hardly heresy now, is it? So before you start passing judgement on faceless internet zoids on who is arguing maturely and who is squeaing like a stuck pig (which is to read as - who is arguing on your side or not) - perhaps take an objective look of your very own approach
My stance on the subject is to accept that people have differing opinions. My stance is to accept that I am not entitled to pigeon hole people simply because of their differing opinions. My stance is to argue maturely against those opinions if I happen to disagree with them. That's what grown up debate is.
Quite the opposite of your stance, it seems. You appear to be so threatened by differing opinions that you resort to gratuitously attaching inaccurate labels to anyone who dissents from your point of view. It seems that that is your only means of discrediting what they have to say. You are incapable of arguing against the points being made so you resort to playground name calling instead.
As I said..........tedious.
Oh the ironing - I won't even bother looking for some of your quotes towards me from a few weeks back. Real mature grown-up debate.
By contrast, you resort to tossing around labels as your only means of discrediting those with whom you disagree. Why? Because your case is weak? Or because you lack the intellect to argue what is actually a strong case? Or because you are just a child? Or a troll?
Another pathetic insult from the mature debater that is yourself -well done big man - you win the internet.
Is your stance to accept different opinions? Strange - all you ever seem to do in these kind of threads is either copy/paste some info from the skyscraper forums or state as fact what we can and cannot do financially - in addition to refuting anyone who dares to post something against DL. Calling you up on some these is not discrediting you - that would be the equivalent of saying you're taking gonads or similar insults (see above) - don't recall such occurence taking place. In addition you seem to take offence to anyone refusing to acknowledge your 'points'. It is clear as daylight you mainly seem to populate the Levy threads these days - so for anyone to suggest you might have a point to make is hardly heresy now, is it? So before you start passing judgement on faceless internet zoids on who is arguing maturely and who is squeaing like a stuck pig (which is to read as - who is arguing on your side or not) - perhaps take an objective look of your very own approach
Last edited: