If a Manager got an intern to buy a sex toy there would be a good chance that they would have to do 2 week HR course in the places I worked at (if they were lucky), if they did anything similar it would be very likely they would be asked to leave.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Politics, politics, politics
- Thread starter markysimmo
- Start date
Some good advice I had on this was from a fellow IoD member. He told me that if you are going to put your dingdong in a 20 year old that works for you, think about what the end game is (and by that I don't think he meant where you would "finish").
She doesn't want to fudge you because you're incredibly good looking (although, I am, of course) for an evening of excitement. At best the attraction will be based on the natural selection "that guy is a good choice to father my children" instinct, or at worst case, it's a cynical attempt to get a nice shopping trip and a payrise.
So the end result is that you marry her or you promote her. If you do neither, the affair won't just peter out to a point where you nod and smile to each other, maybe discussing the weather in the corridor. The point being (and there may have been some Scotch involved) is that it's far cheaper and less hassle to pay a hooker. She'll probably be better looking and better at what she does, she won't want a hug afterwards and you don't have the career risk.
Danishfurniturelover
the prettiest spice girl
Pretty much what Scara says. Couple of hundred on a hooker and far less trouble. As we are not famous the hooker wont sell the story.
Always got told dont poo where you eat.
Always got told dont poo where you eat.
StephenH
David Ginola
I didnt need telling!
ricky2tricky4city
Steffen Freund
Hey, don't undersell yourself, you're famous on here.
Danishfurniturelover
the prettiest spice girl
I am in the process of writing my memoirs.
AuroRaman
Chris Armstrong
*all the popcorn gifs in the world
Sitting on my porcelain throne using Fapatalk
Happy Balfour day peeps.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
This has a good portrayal of Williamson
Is it normal for secretaries of state to go abroad and meet other heads of state without the knowledge of the PM or Foreign Office? And then lie about it afterwards? May can't sack her because...
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/nov/06/priti-patel-apologises-for-israel-meetings
Priti Patel has apologised and been rebuked by Theresa May after admitting she gave a misleading account of a personal trip to Israel that included a previously undisclosed meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu.
The international development secretary acknowledged she had met the Israeli prime minister during a family holiday in August and given the false impression in an interview with the Guardian that the UK Foreign Office knew about it in advance.
No 10 issued a statement on Monday saying May met Patel earlier in the day and discussed with her a possible breach of the ministerial code.
A No 10 spokesman said: “The prime minister welcomes the secretary of state’s clarification about her trip to Israel and has accepted her apology for her handling of the matter. The prime minister met the secretary of state this morning to remind her of the obligations which exist under the ministerial code.”
The rebuke, apology and expressions of regret are highly embarrassing and come as the Foreign Office is engaged in a turf war with the Department for International Development (DfID) over future projects.
It will be followed by demands that there is an immediate investigation into how a cabinet minister – touted as a possible successor to May – failed to declare meetings with foreign politicians whilst on a private visit.
In Patel’s statement of apology she admits she met three senior Israeli politicians including Netanyahu, 10 representatives of Israeli organisations and startups with a focus on Africa. “This summer I travelled to Israel, on a family holiday paid for myself.
“In hindsight, I can see how my enthusiasm to engage in this way could be misread, and how meetings were set up and reported in a way which did not accord with the usual procedures. I am sorry for this and I apologise for it,” she added.
Her meeting with Netanyahu included a discussion of Patel’s “family background” including “her experience growing up in an area of the UK with a thriving Jewish community” and “her political journey”.
A BBC report on Friday morning claimed that official departmental business was discussed during visits on which Patel was accompanied by Lord Polak, the honorary president of Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI), a lobbying organisation.
James Landale, the BBC’s diplomatic editor, said she was on a family holiday on 24 August when she met Yair Lapid, the leader of Israel’s Yesh Atid party and a former finance minister in Netanyahu’s coalition government.
Following a request for an interview about the BBC’s claims, Patel then told the Guardian: “Boris [Johnson] knew about the visit. The point is that the Foreign Office did know about this, Boris knew about [the trip]. It is not on, it is not on at all.
“I went out there, I paid for it,” she said. “And there is nothing else to this. It is quite extraordinary. It is for the Foreign Office to go away and explain themselves.”
But under the heading “clarification of remarks to the Guardian newspaper”, Patel admitted that Johnson had not been informed in advance. “This quote may have given the impression that the secretary of state had informed the foreign secretary about the visit in advance. The secretary of state would like to take this opportunity to clarify that this was not the case. The foreign secretary did become aware of the visit, but not in advance of it,” the statement said.
Patel also implied in her interview that she had attended only two meetings outlined by the BBC. She said: “The stuff that is out there is it, as far as I am concerned. I went on holiday and met with people and organisations. As far as I am concerned, the Foreign Office have known about this. It is not about who else I met, I have friends out there.”
Her statement on Monday said this too gave a false impression.
“This quote may be read as implying that the secretary of state was saying that the meetings that had so far been publicly reported were the only ones which took place on her visit,” it read. “The secretary of state would like to take the opportunity to correct this impression: she is clear that other meetings also took place on her visit.”
A full list shows she attended 12 separate events, including a meeting with Netanyahu in which “prospects for closer collaboration” were discussed.
Patel also met the director general of the Israeli foreign ministry, Yuval Rotem, for discussions about “prospects for partnership work”; discussed “growing antisemitism” in British politics in separate meetings with public security minister Gilad Erdan and Lapid; and visited a host of charities, non-governmental organisations and businesses.
Meetings were arranged by Lord Polak and he attended them all apart from one, when Patel was introduced to the work of the Pears Programme For Global Innovation by its director, Aliza Inbal.
On returning from her trip to Israel, which took place between 13 and 25 August, Patel commissioned DfID work on humanitarian and development partnerships between Israel and the UK, and on disability. “The FCO [Foreign Office] are clear that UK interests were not damaged or affected by the meetings on this visit,” DfID said.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/nov/06/priti-patel-apologises-for-israel-meetings
Priti Patel has apologised and been rebuked by Theresa May after admitting she gave a misleading account of a personal trip to Israel that included a previously undisclosed meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu.
The international development secretary acknowledged she had met the Israeli prime minister during a family holiday in August and given the false impression in an interview with the Guardian that the UK Foreign Office knew about it in advance.
No 10 issued a statement on Monday saying May met Patel earlier in the day and discussed with her a possible breach of the ministerial code.
A No 10 spokesman said: “The prime minister welcomes the secretary of state’s clarification about her trip to Israel and has accepted her apology for her handling of the matter. The prime minister met the secretary of state this morning to remind her of the obligations which exist under the ministerial code.”
The rebuke, apology and expressions of regret are highly embarrassing and come as the Foreign Office is engaged in a turf war with the Department for International Development (DfID) over future projects.
It will be followed by demands that there is an immediate investigation into how a cabinet minister – touted as a possible successor to May – failed to declare meetings with foreign politicians whilst on a private visit.
In Patel’s statement of apology she admits she met three senior Israeli politicians including Netanyahu, 10 representatives of Israeli organisations and startups with a focus on Africa. “This summer I travelled to Israel, on a family holiday paid for myself.
“In hindsight, I can see how my enthusiasm to engage in this way could be misread, and how meetings were set up and reported in a way which did not accord with the usual procedures. I am sorry for this and I apologise for it,” she added.
Her meeting with Netanyahu included a discussion of Patel’s “family background” including “her experience growing up in an area of the UK with a thriving Jewish community” and “her political journey”.
A BBC report on Friday morning claimed that official departmental business was discussed during visits on which Patel was accompanied by Lord Polak, the honorary president of Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI), a lobbying organisation.
James Landale, the BBC’s diplomatic editor, said she was on a family holiday on 24 August when she met Yair Lapid, the leader of Israel’s Yesh Atid party and a former finance minister in Netanyahu’s coalition government.
Following a request for an interview about the BBC’s claims, Patel then told the Guardian: “Boris [Johnson] knew about the visit. The point is that the Foreign Office did know about this, Boris knew about [the trip]. It is not on, it is not on at all.
“I went out there, I paid for it,” she said. “And there is nothing else to this. It is quite extraordinary. It is for the Foreign Office to go away and explain themselves.”
But under the heading “clarification of remarks to the Guardian newspaper”, Patel admitted that Johnson had not been informed in advance. “This quote may have given the impression that the secretary of state had informed the foreign secretary about the visit in advance. The secretary of state would like to take this opportunity to clarify that this was not the case. The foreign secretary did become aware of the visit, but not in advance of it,” the statement said.
Patel also implied in her interview that she had attended only two meetings outlined by the BBC. She said: “The stuff that is out there is it, as far as I am concerned. I went on holiday and met with people and organisations. As far as I am concerned, the Foreign Office have known about this. It is not about who else I met, I have friends out there.”
Her statement on Monday said this too gave a false impression.
“This quote may be read as implying that the secretary of state was saying that the meetings that had so far been publicly reported were the only ones which took place on her visit,” it read. “The secretary of state would like to take the opportunity to correct this impression: she is clear that other meetings also took place on her visit.”
A full list shows she attended 12 separate events, including a meeting with Netanyahu in which “prospects for closer collaboration” were discussed.
Patel also met the director general of the Israeli foreign ministry, Yuval Rotem, for discussions about “prospects for partnership work”; discussed “growing antisemitism” in British politics in separate meetings with public security minister Gilad Erdan and Lapid; and visited a host of charities, non-governmental organisations and businesses.
Meetings were arranged by Lord Polak and he attended them all apart from one, when Patel was introduced to the work of the Pears Programme For Global Innovation by its director, Aliza Inbal.
On returning from her trip to Israel, which took place between 13 and 25 August, Patel commissioned DfID work on humanitarian and development partnerships between Israel and the UK, and on disability. “The FCO [Foreign Office] are clear that UK interests were not damaged or affected by the meetings on this visit,” DfID said.
Hotshot-Tottenham
Edgar Davids
This is a fun thread.
Hotshot-Tottenham
Edgar Davids
And this guy's a leaver.
You see, this is why you people need to leave your echo chambers.
I can sum up that waste of a couple of minutes of my life as follows:
UK not budging = stupidity and stubbornness
EU not budging = playing by the rules
If the EU continues to insist the UK gives away all its chips before we can start negotiations then I guarantee you now that "no deal" will be the result. One thing absolutely guaranteed to be worse than "no deal" (however apocalyptic you think that will be) is giving away everything now and letting the EU decide what they fancy giving us later.
You misspelt bedwetter
So Johnson's careless remarks might mean that a British citizen banged up abroad ends up doing more time -- yet while he will "clarify" them to rectify his stupidity, he won't apologise for the aggravation caused.
What an incompetent, arrogant qunt. Enough of this "oh it's just Boris" nonsense that allows him to get away with being a professional buffoon. If May wasn't such a limp-d1ck she'd be able to get rid of him. Sick of this lot.
What an incompetent, arrogant qunt. Enough of this "oh it's just Boris" nonsense that allows him to get away with being a professional buffoon. If May wasn't such a limp-d1ck she'd be able to get rid of him. Sick of this lot.
What if he was telling the truth about her being there? He's merely clarifying, after all, not changing his view.
I'm fairly sure he was telling the truth - I don't think that excuses him from being criticised for saying it publicly if her defence says otherwise.
And he should at least apologise for causing aggravation - he doesn't have to be wrong to be sorry.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
The fresh wind of change and freedom created by Brexit is making the country happy apparently: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-41893598