But that would mean @markysimmo has just blindly copy & pasted some baseless, misleading wrong-end-of-the-stick shyte he’s seen on social media and dumped in it here. That can’t be right can it, I mean I can’t remember that ever happening before?
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)
- Thread starter SpurMeUp
- Start date
I was done the moment they "discovered" the numbers they'd had from the OBR months ago meant they had to increase taxes.
It took them less than a week for the veil of a party that understands economics to fall and reveal a bunch of Trots.
Baleforce
Martin Peters
ricky2tricky4city
Tom Huddlestone
Mikey10
Nick Barmby
I’d say 10 - minimum. People won’t quickly forget the last few years of catastrophic government.
If you'd like another example - look at unions donating to the party and then their members immediately getting paid more of our money.
That will be orders of magnitude larger than any contract won by Conservative donors.
ricky2tricky4city
Tom Huddlestone
Can you be more specific?
monkeybarry
Jack Jull
The next election will be a very different proposition and unlikely to result in a big majority.
A lot will happen on 5 years, but a hung parliament is quite likely I think. UK politics seems like it's moving away from two party politics.
monkeybarry
Jack Jull
That is a fair concern - and one we can judge in 1,2,3 years etc.
But it certainly isn't the case at present and the rhetoric coming from Starmer Labour is for reasonable pay rise levels for industries whose pay structures are not profit generated.
That is entirely different to lining Tory pockets on falsehoods.
Public sector Vs private sector working is a choice - in the public sector you should have an expectation of steady and reasonable pay increases to reflect national economic conditions; in the private sector you have made a choice to be at the mercy of market forces, and therefore both it's boom and bust cycles.
markysimmo
Johnny nice-tits
thfcsteff
George Hunt
I doubt he can.
ricky2tricky4city
Tom Huddlestone
You really are the king of miscomprehension.
markysimmo
Johnny nice-tits
Really, quoted in the Guardian he would reduce energy costs
In October on BBC up 9% so once again he hasn't done what he said he would when in power and has fudged over loads of pensioners already in need
No made up sources
Last edited:
ricky2tricky4city
Tom Huddlestone
Not questioning your sources...just comprehension.
One is a rise in wholesale prices that the government have little control over.
The other is a pledge to cut bills by creating 'Great British Energy' so the government does have more control over those prices and enable them to reduce UK bills, a reduction he estimates would be £400.
Now it is a bit disappointing that he hasn't set this up within the first 60 days of government (lol) to counteract that wholesale price increase but probably not as disappointing as people that want to conflate two separate things just to be negative by virtue of firing off silly memes from their various feeds everyday.
Sure.
In 2023 Labour received £6m in donations from trades unions. Within a few weeks of getting elected, they tinkled our money away on over-inflation pay rises for doctors, nurses, NHS managers and train drivers.
There are individual links too.
Wes Streeting has received over £14k from unions over the last few years. Pretty much all of those unions have members in the NHS who have received pay rises.
Louise Haigh has had over £24k from unions in that time - her dept has signed off on ridiculously large pay rises for obsolete jobs.
markysimmo
Johnny nice-tits
Whether it be Labour, Conservatives, Reform one thing that is abundantly obvious is that they all honestly could not give one fudge about us all they care about is their own massive ego's and getting their noses in the money trough and what they can get out of it for themselves
Baleforce
Martin Peters
Lol
That’s three groups of people subjected to effective pay cuts repeatedly over the last 14 years.
parklane1
Vic Buckingham
Is the r ight answer, they are all in it for themselves.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
The ones forced onto working tax credits and into foodbanks because their wages depreciated so much.
ricky2tricky4city
Tom Huddlestone
@scaramanga is beside himself that we are 'tinkling' his money away on giving pay rises to people that care for other people.
Understandable as completely jars against his own ideologies.