braineclipse
Steve Sedgley
Re: Official - Paulinho
I didn't say it was the same situation with Walker, did I? I think it's comparable and worth noting that some players recover their form through continuously getting time on the pitch. If AVB rates Paulinho highly and thinks he'll be able to do that then it could make a lot of rational sense to keep playing him whereas you seem to claim that the only possible reason to keep playing his is either a contract issue or some irrational reason.
AVB showed clearly that he can be ruthless at Chelsea with Alex and Anelka. For us he's shown it with for example Dawson who he made captain and then tried to sell, Ekotto (imo) and arguably a few more like Dempsey, Defoe, Sig along the way.
Walker was turd water for around 6 or 7 months of last season but our back up option hasn't proven he can play week in week out in this league consistently so he stuck with him (wrong decision imo as Naughton should have been given a chance). I'm not willing to accept the same situation with Paulinho because:
A) centre midfield is a far more important position than FB imo.
B) Our supposed 'back up' option is a better player.
Who has AVB shown he's ruthless with btw?
I didn't say it was the same situation with Walker, did I? I think it's comparable and worth noting that some players recover their form through continuously getting time on the pitch. If AVB rates Paulinho highly and thinks he'll be able to do that then it could make a lot of rational sense to keep playing him whereas you seem to claim that the only possible reason to keep playing his is either a contract issue or some irrational reason.
AVB showed clearly that he can be ruthless at Chelsea with Alex and Anelka. For us he's shown it with for example Dawson who he made captain and then tried to sell, Ekotto (imo) and arguably a few more like Dempsey, Defoe, Sig along the way.