i think Wenger is right in what he says tbh
i think Wenger is right in what he says tbh - refs are supposed to be impartial as they're professionals, but at the same time as per my post on the previous page -the FA are saying that they aren't impartial hence the ruling they cannot officiate matches involving the team they support. the FA have created the confusion and would be best served removing the conflict of interest rule altogether
i think Wenger is right in what he says tbh - refs are supposed to be impartial as they're professionals, but at the same time as per my post on the previous page -the FA are saying that they aren't impartial hence the ruling they cannot officiate matches involving the team they support. the FA have created the confusion and would be best served removing the conflict of interest rule altogether
He wont. The forecast says no rain and 10 degreesWell, after ending ManU's 15 year hoodoo at WHL last weekend, hopefully Pochettino will break his duck against Stoke City on a cold, wet Monday night...
http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/mauricio-pochettino/leistungsdatenDetail/trainer/9044/gegner_id/512
W:0 / D:4 / L:2 / GF:7 / GA:11 / PPG:0.67
He wont. The forecast says no rain and 10 degrees
According to this, he's a Tranmere fan :Lol; i always hear (and even feel) this, but what evidence (apart from his celebrations) is there that Dean is a Spurs fan?
Wenger has Fokked me off yet again. What's he talking about a worrying precedent? Outside of Football in situations where some one is making decisions affecting someone else, any potential conflicts of interest should be declared and the affected decision maker may be taken out of the process. It is not a criticism of the integrity of Kevin Friend per se. There does not have to be actual bias just the perception of bias. There is nothing to see here, I don't get the fuss and what has it got to do with the French twit anyway. Perhaps he trying to deflect attention from his team of bottlers.
Haters will be hating...It's being written off as Stoke not turning up a lot of places. but I actually didn't think they were that bad. A little toothless, but in the first half they were half decent.
It's being written off as Stoke not turning up a lot of places. but I actually didn't think they were that bad. A little toothless, but in the first half they were half decent.
I missed the first 20 minutes, from when I turned on we were 1-0 up but the game was being played in our half, they only really collapsed when the 3rd went in imo